|
Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 430-436
|
Screening for chlamydia trachomatis infection using the BDProbeTec™ ET Chlamydia trachomatis amplified DNA assay on urine in a GUM clinic setting: A simple, fast and cost-effective alternative
|
Author keywords
BDProbeTec ET assay; Chlamydia trachomatis; Culture; Nucleic acid amplification technology; Urine
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BACTERIUM DETECTION;
CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS;
CHLAMYDIASIS;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
DNA DETERMINATION;
FEMALE;
HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT;
HUMAN;
HUMAN TISSUE;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MALE;
NUCLEIC ACID ANALYSIS;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SCREENING TEST;
UNITED KINGDOM;
URINE CULTURE;
CHLAMYDIA INFECTIONS;
CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS;
COST ALLOCATION;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DNA, BACTERIAL;
FEMALE;
FEMALE UROGENITAL DISEASES;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MALE UROGENITAL DISEASES;
NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES;
OUTPATIENT CLINICS, HOSPITAL;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
WALES;
|
EID: 0034938642
PISSN: 09564624
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1258/0956462011923453 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (27)
|