Stewardship and the US Department of Energy: Encompassing ecosystem protection

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 437-454

  Burger, J ^a   Gochfeld, M ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ENERGY PLANNING; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034932655     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640560120060894     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Science: Opening the next chapter of conservation history
2. Regulatory and institutional considerations in the application of ecological risk assessment at federal facilities
3. The great DOE land rush?
4. The role of ecology in biological conservation
5. Recreation and risk
6. American Indians, hunting and fishing rates, risk, and the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
7. Environmental monitoring on Department of Energy lands: The need for a holistic plan
8. Recreation, consumption of wild game, risk, and the Department of Energy sites perceptions of people attending the Lewiston, ID, 'Roundup'
9. The tragedy of the commons: 30 years later
10. Risk perception, federal spending, and the Savannah River Site: Attitudes of hunters and fishermen
11. Gender differences in recreational use, environmental attitudes and perceptions of future land use at Savannah River Site
12. Attitudes and perceptions about ecological resources, hazards, and future land use of people living near the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
13. Ecological restoration: Reestablishing humanity's relationship with natural systems
14. Ecosystem health concepts as a management tool
15. Consortium for risk evaluation with stakeholder participation
16. Developing ecological research that is relevant for achieving sustainability
17. A report on the workshop on improving exposure analysis for DOE sites, September, 1996, San Francisco, CA
18. Preserving DOE's research parks
19. Avian research at the Savannah River Site: A model for integrating basic research and long-term management
20. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes
21. Regional economic benefits of environmental management at the US Department of Energy's major nuclear weapons sites
22. The Hanford reach: What do we stand to lose?
23. The Savannah river ecology laboratory
24. Socioeconomic impacts of US nuclear weapons facilities: A local scale analysis of Savannah River, 1958-1993
25. Economic impact of accelerated cleanup on regions surrounding the US DOE's major nuclear weapons sites
26. The tragedy of the commons
27. Native American exposure scenarios and a tribal risk model
28. Incorporating stewardship in your monitoring program
29. Ecological risk assessment
30. Some fundamentals of conservation in the southwest
31. Implications of resources management at the Nevada test site
32. Protection of biota on nonpark public lands: Examples from the US Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation
33. A different perspective on sustainability
34. Stewardship: A total definition
35. Seeking common ground for environmental change
36. A framework for ecological risk assessment at the EPA
37. DOE nurtures openness to mend past miscues
38. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies
39. Natural resources stewardship
40. Evaluating consistency of categorizing; biodiversity management status relative to land stewardship in the gap analysis program
41. Biodiversity and ecosystem function
42. How important is wilderness? Results from a United States survey
43. DOE forges partnerships for environmental cleanup
44. Enhanced recreational opportunities at USDOE sites: Economic evaluation of an alternative land use scenario at Savannah River Site
45. What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves?
46. Ecosystem management and the arrogance of humanism
47. Promoting watershed stewardship
48. Environmental challenge: Technological response