메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 345-353

Moral justification for Tarasoff-type warnings and breach of confidentiality: A clinician's perspective

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; EMERGENCY; INFORMED CONSENT; MORALITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; VIOLENCE;

EID: 0034932532     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.446     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (18)

References (25)
  • 2
    • 0004563803 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 593 P2d 553, 118 Cal Rptr 129 (Cal Sup Ct 1974)
  • 8
    • 0004635717 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 551 P2d 334, 17 Cal 3d 425 (Cal Sup Ct. 1976)
  • 9
    • 0004584495 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Santa Cruz v. Dade County Health Center 1991. [590. 50.2d 444 (Fla. APP. 3 Dist 1991]
  • 21
    • 0004593388 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Jaffee v. Redmond, 116 S. Ct. 1923 (1996)
  • 23
    • 0004566690 scopus 로고
    • Shall venereal disease be reportable to the board of health?
    • (1911) NY Statical Med Journal , vol.11 , pp. 311-312


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.