Introduction to this issue: The clinician's duty to warn or protect

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 321-324

  Felthous, Alan R ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDITORIAL; INFORMED CONSENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; VIOLENCE;

DUTY TO WARN; HUMANS;

EID: 0034929858     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.445     Document Type: Editorial

References (18)

1. Rethinking the duty to protect
2. Tarasoff v. confidentiality
3. Threat assessment: Defining an approach for evaluating risk of targeted violence
4. "Where the public peril beings": 25 Years after Tarasoff
5. The fin de millennaire duty to warn or protect
6. The so-called duty to warn: The psychotherapeutic duty to protect third parties from patients' violent acts
7. Assessing threats of targeted group violence: Contributions from social psychology
8. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425 (1976)
9. The prediction of violent behavior and the duty to protect third parties