Invited commentary - Rapid review: Current practice

Cytopathology

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 249-250

  Faraker, C A ^a  

^a East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TECHNIQUE; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; OBSERVER VARIATION; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UTERINE CERVICAL DISEASES; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0034928349     PISSN: 09565507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2001.00343.x     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Rapid review
2. False negative cervical cytology due to failure to identify abnormal microscopic appearances
3. Partial re-screening of all negative smears: An improved method of quality assurance in laboratories undertaking cervical screening
4. Rapid review (partial re-screening) of cervical cytology. Four years experience and quality control implications
5. Role of re-screening of cervical smears in internal quality control