An analysis of entry-level, disposable, instant-fit, and implantable hearing aids

Hearing Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 28-43

  Sweetow, Robert W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOLOGY; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEARING AID; MARKETING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF LIFE; TECHNOLOGY; TIME;

EID: 0034925348     PISSN: 07457472     EISSN: 15425991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000294453.31532.c2     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Kochkin S: Customer satisfaction with single and multiple microphone digital hearing aids. Hear Rev 2000;7(11):24-34.
2. Kochkin S: Marke Trak V: “Baby-Boomers” spur growth in potential market, but penetration declines. Hear J 1999;52(1):33-48.
3. Sweetow R, Shelton C: Analysis of time/cost and satisfaction factors for programmable versus conventional hearing aids. Hear J 1996;49(4), 51-57.
4. Hall M, Jacobs E: Programmable versus conventional hearing devices. Hear Instr 1992;43(3):36-37.