Editorial

Nuclear Medicine Communications

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 851-855

  Hesse, B ^a   Kjaer, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DIPYRIDAMOLE; DOBUTAMINE; AMINOPHYLLINE; ATROPINE; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

EDITORIAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; HEART; HEART MUSCLE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SCINTISCANNING; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; BRONCHOSPASM; CARDIOTOXICITY; CORONARY ARTERY DILATATION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; HEART MUSCLE OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; HEART SCINTISCANNING; HEART STRESS; HEART VENTRICLE ARRHYTHMIA; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW;

ADENOSINE; DIPYRIDAMOLE; DOBUTAMINE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; HEART; HUMANS; MYOCARDIUM; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 0034918776     PISSN: 01433636     EISSN: 14735628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006231-200108000-00002     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. O’Keefe Jr JH, Bateman TM, Handlin LR, Barnhart CS. Four- versus 6-minute infusion protocol for adenosine thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography imaging. Am Heart J 1995; 129: 482-487.
2. Santos-Ocampo CD, Herman SD, Travin MI, et al. Comparison of exercise, dipyridamole, and adenosine by use of technetium 99m sestamibi tomographic imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 1994; 1: 57-64.
3. Cuocolo A, Nicolai E, Soricelli A, et al. Technetium 99m-labeled tetrofosmin myocardial tomography in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between adenosine and dynamic exercise stress testing. J Nucl Cardiol 1996; 3: 194-203.
4. Nishimura S, Mahmarian JJ, Boyce TM, Verani MS. Equivalence between adenosine and exercise thallium-201 myocardial tomography: a multicenter, prospective, crossover trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 265-275.
5. Gupta NC, Esterbrooks DJ, Hilleman DE, Mohiuddin SM. Comparison of adenosine and exercise thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging. The GE SPECT Multicenter Adenosine Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 248-257.
6. Levine MG, Ahlberg AW, Mann A, et al. Comparison of exercise, dipyridamole, adenosine, and dobutamine stress with the use of Tc-99m tetrofosmin tomographic imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 1999; 6: 389-396.
7. Rossen JD, Quillen JE, Lopez AG, Stenberg RG, Talman CL, Winniford MD. Comparison of coronary vasodilation with intravenous dipyridamole and adenosine. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 485-491.
8. Chan SY, Brunken RC, Czernin J, et al. Comparison of maximal myocardial blood flow during adenosine infusion with that of intravenous dipyridamole in normal men. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 979-985.
9. Skopicki HA, Abraham SA, Picard MH, Alpert NM, Fischman AJ, Gewirtz H. Effects of dobutamine at maximally tolerated dose on myocardial blood flow in humans with ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1997;: 3346-3352. (Published erratum appears in Circulation: 414.)
10. Marwick T, Willemart B, D’Hondt AM, et al. Selection of the optimal non-exercise stress for the evaluation of ischemic regional myocardial dysfunction and malperfusion. Comparison of dobutamine and adenosine using echocardiography and 99mTc-MIBI single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1993; 87: 345-354.