|
Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 533-540
|
A cost-utility analysis comparing second-line chemotherapy schemes in patients with metastatic breast cancer
|
Author keywords
Cost effectiveness analysis; Cost utility analysis; Decision model; Docetaxel; Metastatic breast cancer; Paclitaxel; Quality adjusted life years; Second line chemotherapy; Vinorelbine
|
Indexed keywords
DOCETAXEL;
MITOMYCIN C;
NAVELBINE;
PACLITAXEL;
VINBLASTINE;
ARTICLE;
BREAST CANCER;
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY;
COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY;
COST UTILITY ANALYSIS;
DECISION MAKING;
DRUG COST;
DRUG EFFICACY;
FLUID RETENTION;
HUMAN;
LIFE EXPECTANCY;
NEUROTOXICITY;
NEUTROPENIA;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR;
ADULT;
AGED;
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS;
ANTINEOPLASTIC COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY PROTOCOLS;
BREAST NEOPLASMS;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MIDDLE AGED;
MITOMYCIN;
MODELS, STATISTICAL;
NEOPLASM METASTASIS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
TIME FACTORS;
VINBLASTINE;
|
EID: 0034915869
PISSN: 09594973
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200107000-00007 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (16)
|
References (34)
|