Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in Guinea Pigs;Alteraciones moderadas de los productos de distorsion de las emisiones otoacusticas después de sobrexposición acústica moderada en cobayos

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 113-122

  Kossowski, Michel ^b   Mom, Thierry ^c   Guitton, Matthieu ^a   Poncet, Jean Luc ^b   Bonfils, Pierre ^a   Avan, Paul ^c  

^a BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

^b Hôpital des Armées Val de Grace   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Acoustic overexposure; Auditory fatigue; Distortion product otoacoustic emissions; Hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; AUDITORY THRESHOLD SHIFT; COCHLEA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EXPOSURE; FEMALE; GUINEA PIG; MALE; NOISE MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND INTENSITY; SOUND LEVEL MEASUREMENT; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BODY TEMPERATURE; FEMALE; GUINEA PIGS; HEARING DISORDERS; MALE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 0034915719     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206090109073106     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Kemp D T. Bray P, Alexander L, Brown AM. Acoustic emission cochleo-graphy–practical aspects. Scand Audiol 1986; 25(suppl)71–96
2. Martin G K, Ohlms L A, Franklin D J, Harris F P, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Distortion-product emissions in humans: III: Influence of sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 147(suppl)29–44
3. Brown A M, Kemp D T. Suppressibility of the 2f1–f2 stimulated acoustic amission in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29–37
4. Kim D O, Molnar C E, Matthews J W. Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve fiber responses and ear-canal sound pressure. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 1704–1721
5. Avan P, Magnan P, Smurzynski J, Probst R, Dancer A. Direct evidence of cubic difference tone propagation by mtracochlear acoustic pressure measurements in the guinea-pig. Eur J Neurosci 1998; 10: 1764–1770
6. Mountain D C. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science 1980; 210: 71–72
7. Trautwein P, Hofstetter P, Wang J, Salvi R J, Nostrant A. Selective inner hair cell loss does not alter distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1996; 96: 71–82
8. Clark W W, Bohne B A. Animal model ior the 4-kHz tonal dip. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1978; 51(suppl)1–16
9. Hamernik R P, Patterson J H, Turrentine G A, Ahroon W A. The quantitative relation between sensory cell loss and hearing thresholds. Hear Res 1989; 38: 199–212
10. Dolan T G, Abbas P J. Changes in the 2f1–f2 acoustic emission and whole-nerve response following sound exposure: long-term effects. J. Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 1475–1483
11. Flinkert P K, Hemmert W, Wagner W, Just K, Zenner H P. Monitoring noise susceptibility: sensitivity of otoacoustic emissions and subjective audiometry. Br J Audiol 1999; 33: 367–382
12. Sutton L A, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K, Whitehead M L. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal overexposure: lime course of recovery and effects of lowering L2. Hear Res 1994; 75: 161–174
13. Engdahl B. Effects of noise and exercise (in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1996; 93: 72–82
14. Kimberley B P, Brown D K, Eggermont JI. Measuring human cochlear (raveling wave delay using distortion product emission phase responses. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 1343–1350
15. Avan P, Bonfils P, Loth D. Effects of acoustic overstimulation on distortion-product and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Scientific basis of noise-induced hearing loss, A, Axelsson, H, Borchgrevink, R P, Hamernik, P A, Hellstrom, D, Henderson, R J, Salvi. Thieme, New York 1996; 65–81
16. Brown A M, Gaskill S A, Williams D M. Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1992; 250: 29–34
17. Allen J B, Fahey P F. A second cochlear frequency map that correlates distortion products and neural tuning measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 809–816
18. Bowman D M, Eggermont JJ, Brown D K, Kimberley B P. Estimating cochlear filter response properties from distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) phase delay measurements in normal hearing human adults. Hear Res 1998; 119: 14–26
19. Patuzzi R, Robertson D. Tuning in the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 1998; 68: 1009–1082
20. Subramaniam M, Henselman L W, Spongr V, Henderson D, Powers N L. Effects of high-frequency interrupted noise exposures on evoked-potential thresholds, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, and outer hair cells. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 372–381
21. Allen J B. User manual for the Cubdis distortion product measurement system. AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ 1990
22. Cody A R, Johnstone B M. Acoustic trauma: single neuron basis for the ‘half octave shift’. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 70: 707–711
23. McFadden D. Intense sounds may alter the mechanical properties of the cochlear partition. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74: 447–455
24. Davis H. An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 1983; 9: 79–90
25. Clark J A, Pickles J O. The effect of moderate and low levels of acoustic overstimulation on stereocilia and their tip links in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1996; 99: 119–128
26. Robertson D, Johnstone B M, McGill T J. Effect of loud tones on the inner ear: a combined electrophysiological and ultrastructural study. Hear Res 1980; 2: 39–53
27. Canlon B, Fransson A. Morphological and functional preservation of the outer hair cells from noise trauma by sound conditioning. Hear Res 1995; 84: 112–124
28. Gao W Y, Ding D L, Zheng X Y, Ruan F M, Liu Y J. A comparison in the stereocilia between temporary and permanent hearing losses in acoustic trauma. Hear Res 1992; 62: 27–41
29. Brown A M, McDowell B, Forge A. Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res 1989; 42: 143–156
30. Brownell W E. Outer hair cell electro-motility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 82–92
31. Probst R, Londbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2027–2067
32. Martin G K, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Probst R, Scheinin S A, Coats A C. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures. Hear Res 1987; 28: 191–208
33. Fahey P F, Allen J B. Measurement of distortion product phase in the ear canal of the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 2880–2891
34. Talmadge C L, Long G R, Tubis A, Dhar S. Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105: 275–292
35. Engstrom B, Flock A, Borg E. Ultrastructural studies of stereocilia in noise-exposed rabbits ears. Hear Res 1983; 12: 251–264
36. Kaltenbach J A, Schmidt R N, Kaplan C R. Tone induced stereocilia lesions as a function of exposure level and duration in the hamster cochlea. Hear Res 1992; 60: 205–215
37. Puel J L, d'Aldin C, Ruel J, Ladrech S, Pujol R. Perspectives in inner ear pharmacology and clinical application. Cochlear pharmacology and noise trauma, D, Prasher, B, Canlon. Noise Research Network Publications, London 1999; 1–7
38. Puel J L, Bobbin R P, Fallon M. The active process is affected first by intense sound exposure. Hear Res 1988; 37: 53–64
39. Puel J L, Durrieu J P, Rebillard G, Vidal D, Assié R, Uziel A. Comparison between auditory brainstem responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions after temporary threshold shift in guinea pig. Acta Acust 1995; 3: 75–82
40. Eddins A C, Zuskov M, Salvi R J. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during prolonged noise exposure. Hear Res 1999; 127: 119–128
41. Attias J, Bresloff I, Reshev I, Horowitz G, Furman V. Evaluating noise induced hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 39–46
42. Hamernik R P, Ahroon W A, Lei S F. The cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the normal and noise-damaged chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100: 1003–1012
43. Mills D M. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions measurements: 1. two stimulus tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 413–429
44. Skellett R A, Crist J R, Fallon M, Bobbin P. Chronic low-level noise exposure alters distortion otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1996; 98: 68–76
45. Patuzzi R. Exponential onset and recovery of temporary threshold shift after loud sound: evidence for long-term inactivation of mechano-electrical transduction channels. Hear Res 1998; 125: 17–38
46. Preyer S, Gummer A W. Nonlinearity of mechanoelectrical transduction of outer hair cells as the source of nonlinear basilar-membrane motion and loudness recruitment. Audiol Neurootol 1996; 1: 3–11
47. Harris F P, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Stagner B B, Coats A C, Martin G K. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 220–229
48. Allen J B. Cochlear micromechanics: a physical model of transduction. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 1660–1670
49. Stover L J, Neely S T, Gorga M P. Cochlear generation of intermodulation distortion revealed by DPOAE frequency functions in normal and impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 106: 2669–2678
50. Kanis L J, de Boer E. Frequency dependence of acoustic distortion products in a locally active model of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101: 1527–1531