A review of characterisation requirements for in-line prefermenters paper 2: Process characterisation

Water SA

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 413-422

  Rossle W H ^a   Pretorius, W A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FERMENTATION KINETICS; ONLINE MONITORING; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SLUDGE CONDITIONING;

COST EFFECTIVENESS; SEWAGE TANKS;

PREFERMENTATIONS;

SLUDGE DISPOSAL;

BIODEGRADATION; DESIGN; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; FATTY ACID; FERMENTATION;

EID: 0034909568     PISSN: 03784738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v27i3.4986     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. A model for optimum design of activated sludge plants
2. Primary sedimentation of sewage
3. Control of BNRAS processes by regulation of the VFA/M ratio
4. Optimisation of primary sludge acidogenic fermentation for biological nutrient removal
5. Cut N and P without chemicals. Part 1
6. Cut N and P without chemicals. Part 2
7. Activated primary tanks for phosphate removal
8. Kelownademonstrates the art of optimization
9. Secondary phosphorus release in biological phosphorus removal systems
10. Upgrading to nutrient removal by means of internal carbon from sludge hydrolysis
11. Sludge blanket monitoring improves process control, cuts costs
12. An empirical model for primary sedimentation of sewage
13. Performance improves at Penticton
14. Primary fermentation of soluble and particulate organic matter for wastewater treatment
15. Conversion processes in anaerobic digestion
16. Operating experience with two activated primary tanks for sewage prefermentation
17. Operating manual for biological nutrient removal wastewater treatment works
18. Improved biological phosphorus removal resulting from the enrichment of reactor feed with fermentation products
19. Aspects of sewage sludge handling and disposal
20. VFA production in Australian and Canadian prefermenters
21. Design and operation experience with nutrient removing activated sludge plants in Johannesburg
22. Report to the water research commission on a three-year study on the enhancement of biological phosphate removal by altering process feed composition
23. Report to the water research commission on a two-year study on the enhancement of biological phosphate removal by altering process feed composition (Plant and Laboratory Studies)
24. Wastewater characterisation for evaluation of biological phosphorus removal: Wastewater fractionation
25. The effects of pH, temperature and agitation speed on sludge anaerobic hydrolysis - Acidification
26. Design considerations for nutrient removal plants
27. Fermentation of raw sludge and elutriation of resultant fatty acids to promote excess biological phosphorus removal
28. Management of biological nutrient removal plant sludges - Change the paradigms?
29. Biological nutrient removal at the Calgary Bonnybrook WWTP replaces costly chemical phosphorus removal
30. Design and retrofit of wastewater treatment plants for biological nutrient removal
31. Wastewater solids fermentation for volatile acid production and enhanced biological phosphorus removal
32. Is a sedimentation tank really that simple?
33. Kinetics of biological phosphorus release
34. Consolidation of activated sludge and water chemistry research (Jan 1988 - Dec 1990)
35. Fermenting ideas aid nutrient removal at Bonnybrook