메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 350-355

Limits of 80% - 125% for AUC and 70% - 143% for Cmax. What is the impact on bioequivalence studies?

Author keywords

Bioequivalence; Confidence intervals; Sample size

Indexed keywords

GENERIC DRUG;

EID: 0034906872     PISSN: 09461965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5414/CPP39350     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (36)

References (11)
  • 2
    • 85037408699 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Committee for proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP), The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products Note for guidance on the investigation of bioavailability and bioequivalence
    • (2000)
  • 4
    • 0023615056 scopus 로고
    • A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability
    • (1987) J Pharmacokinet Biopharm , vol.15 , pp. 657-680
    • Schuirmann, D.J.1
  • 8
    • 0004324584 scopus 로고
    • Guidance: Statistical procedures for bioequivalence studies using a standard two-treatment crossover design
    • US Food and Drug Administration
    • (1992)
  • 9
    • 85037404590 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Draft Guidance for industry: Food-effect bioavailability and bioequivalence studies
    • US Food and Drug Administration
    • (1998)
  • 10
    • 39549088409 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance for industry: BA and BE studies for orally administered drug products - General considerations
    • US Food and Drug Administration
    • (2000)
  • 11
    • 0003922013 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance for industry. Statistical aproaches to establishing bioequivalence
    • US Food and Drug Administration
    • (2001)


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.