Electroretinogram in the diagnosis of endophthalmitis after intraocular lens implantation

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 132, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 258-259

  Horio, Naoichi ^a   Terasaki, Hiroko ^a   Yamamoto, Etsuko ^a   Miyake, Yozo ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE DURATION; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; ENDOPHTHALMITIS; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; VISUAL ACUITY; VITRECTOMY;

EID: 0034905926     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(01)00928-X     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group. Microbiologic factors and visual outcome in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122:830-846.
2. Hatano H, Sasaki T, Tanaka N. Pseudomonas endophthalmitis in rabbits: intravitreal inoculation of two pseudomonas strains. Acta Soc Ophthalmol 1988;92:1758-1764.
3. Stevens SX, Jensen HG, Jett BD, Gilmore MS. A hemolysin-encoding plasmid contributes to bacterial virulence in experimental Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 1992;33:1650-1656.
4. Kim IT, Park SK, Lim JH. Inflammatory reponse in experimental Stapylococcus and Pseudomonas endophthalmitis. Ophthalmologica 1999;213:305-310.
5. Horio N, Terasaki H, Horiguchi M, Yamamoto E, Miyake Y. Vitrectomy for endophthalmitis after intraocular lens implantation. Jpn J Ophthalomol 2000;44:299-301.