Why Java™ was - not - standardized twice

Computer Standards and Interfaces

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 253-265

  Egyedi, Tineke M ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Compatibility strategies; De facto standard; ECMA; JTC1; Sun

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; STANDARDIZATION;

TECHNOLOGY-ORIENTED COMPATIBILITY CONTROL;

JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE;

EID: 0034901555     PISSN: 09205489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0920-5489(01)00078-2     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Standards as change agents in the information technology market
2. Has Sun gone off on one?
3. Evolutionary pressures in standardisation: Considerations on Ansi's national standards strategy
4. Java standard voted down - For now
5. The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research
6. Compatibility strategies in licensing, open source software and formal standards: Externalities of Java 'standardization'
7. Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product preannouncements and predation
8. Sun confers with licensees over control of Java
9. Sun changes strategy for Java's ISO approval
10. Sun renews Java standards effort
11. Sun revising plan for Java recognition
12. Sun seeks control of Java process
13. Java standard switch: Will new process ease cross-platform compatibility?
14. Het spel van samenwerking en concurrentie: Hybride standaard-selectieprocessen in de ICT sector
15. Java Lobby president calls for reform
16. Sun offers olive branch to Java partners
17. Technological choice in voluntary standards committees: An empirical analysis