Who knows?: Local Non-Timber Forest Product Knowledge and Stewardship Practices in Northern Michigan

Journal of Sustainable Forestry

Volumn 13, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 123-139

  Emery, Marla R ^a  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Local knowledge; Michigan; Non timber forest products; Sustainable use

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; MANAGERS; NATURAL SCIENCES COMPUTING; TIMBER;

NON-TIMBER FORST PRODUCT;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; HARVESTING; KNOWLEDGE; NONTIMBER FOREST PRODUCT; SUSTAINABILITY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034901491     PISSN: 10549811     EISSN: 1540756X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J091v13n03_11     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderson, M.K. 1999. The fire, pruning, and coppice management of temperate ecosystems for basketry material by California Indian tribes. Human Ecology 27(1):79-114.
2. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 9/12/97. U.S. Unemployment rates, 1986-1995. In: Civilian Labor Force Survey, edited by user-defined enquiry system. http://stats.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost: generated by Marla Emery.
3. Cleland, C.E. 1992. Rites of conquest: The history of Michigan's Native Americans. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
4. DeWalt, B.R. 1994. Using indigenous knowledge to improve agricultural and natural resource management. Human Organization 53 (2):123-131.
5. Dunbar, W.F. 1965. Michigan: A History of the Wolverine State. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, MI.
6. Emery, M.R. 1998a. Invisible livelihoods: Non-timber forest products in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Geography, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
7. Emery, M.R. 1999. Social values of specialty forest products to rural communities. In: Josiah, S.J. (ed.). Proceeding of the North American conference on enterprise development through agroforestry: Farming the agroforest for specialty products, Center for Integrated natural Resources and Agriculture Management (CINRAM), Minneapolis, MN.
8. Feldman, S. and R. Welsh. 1995. Feminist knowledge claims, local knowledge, and gender divisions of agricultural labor: Constructing a successor science. Rural Sociology 60 (1):23-43.
9. Flora, C.B. 1992. Reconstructing agriculture: The case for local knowledge. Rural Sociology 57 (1):92-97.
10. Gottesfeld, L.M.J. 1994. Conservation, territory, and traditional beliefs: An analysis of Gitksan and Wet'suwet'en subsistence, Northwest British Columbia, Canada. Human Ecology 22 (4):443-466.
11. Grenand, P. and F. Grenand. 1996. Living in abundance: The forest of the Wayampi (Amerindians from French Guiana). In: M. Ruiz Perez and J.E.M. Arnold (eds.). Current issues in non-timber forest products research. Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta, Indonesia.
12. Haraway, D.J. 1989. Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern sciences. Routledge, London.
13. Harding, S. 1986. The science question in feminism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
14. Homma, A.K.O. 1996. Modernization and technological dualism in the extractive economy in Amazonia. In:M. Ruiz Perez and J.E.M. Arnold (eds.). Current issues in non-timber forest products research. Jakarta, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
15. Kainer, K.A ., and M.L. Duryea. 1992. Tapping women's knowledge: Plant resource use in extractive reserves, Acre, Brazil. Economic Botany 46 (4):408-425.
16. Kimmerer, R.W. 2000. Native knowledge for native ecosystems. Journal of Forestry. 98(8): 4-9.
17. Kloppenburg, J., Jr. 1991. Social theory and the de/reconstruction of agricultural science: Local knowledge for an alternative agriculture. Rural Sociology 56 (4):519-548.
18. Love, T., E. Jones, and L. Liegel. 1998. Valuing the temperate rainforest: Wild mushrooming on the Olympic Peninsula Biosphere Reserve. Ambio Special Report No. 9 (September 1998):16-25.
19. Martin, J.B. 1986. Call It North Country: The Story of Upper Michigan. Third Edition (original printing 1944). Wayne State University Press, Detroit.
20. McLain, R.J., and E.T. Jones. 1997. Challenging 'community' definitions in sustainable natural resource management. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London.
21. Merton, R.K. 1973. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Harper and Row, New York.
22. Mosse, D. 1994. Authority, gender and knowledge: Theoretical reflections on the practice of participatory rural appraisal. Development and Change 25: 497-526.
23. Mulkay, M. 1979. Science and the sociology of knowledge. George Allen & Unwin, London.
24. Murdoch, J., and J. Clark. 1994. Sustainable knowledge. Geoforum 25 (2):115-132.
25. Nabhan, G.P., D. House, H. A. Suzan., W. Hodgson, L.S. Hernandez, and G. Malda. 1991. Conservation and use of rare plants by traditional cultures of the U.S./Mexico borderlands. In: M.L. Oldfield and J.B. Alcorn (eds.). Biodiversity: Culture, conservation, and ecodevelopment, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
26. Richards, R.T. 1997. What the natives know: Wild mushrooms and forest health. Journal of Forestry 95 (9): 5-10.
27. Salow, K.J. 1996. Upper Peninsula unemployment rates: Spring 1996 calculated benchmarks. Michigan Employment Security Commission: Information and Reports Section, Marquette, MI.
28. Schmidt, T.L., Jr. J.S. Spencer, and R. Bertsch. 1997. Michigan's forests 1993: An analysis. Vol. Resource Bulletin NC-179. North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.
29. Tewari, D.D., and J.Y. Campbell. 1995. Developing and sustaining non-timber forest products: Some policy issues and concerns with special reference to India. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 3 (1):53-79.
30. Turner, N.J. 1998. Plant technology of First Peoples in British Columbia. UBC Press, Vancouver.
31. U.S. Census Bureau. 1990. 1990 Census of population and housing. http://venus.census.gov/cdrom/lookup: U.S. Census Bureau Internet Site.