Results of hip revision using the Exeter stem, impacted allograft bone, and cement

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 389, Issue , 2001, Pages 126-133

  Ornstein, Ewald ^a   Atroshi, Isam ^a   Franzén, Herbert ^b   Johnsson, Ragnar ^c   Sandquist, Per ^a   Sundberg, Martin ^a  

^a Hassleholm and Kristianstad Hospitals   (Sweden)

^b Ängelholms Hospital   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE ALLOGRAFT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COXITIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; MALE; PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; STRESS FRACTURE;

EID: 0034899232     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200108000-00018     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Cement migration after THR: A comparison of Charnley Elite and Exeter femoral stems using RSA
2. Interobserver variability in interpreting radiographic lucencies about total hip reconstructions
3. Numerical grading of clinical results
4. Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting
5. Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970
6. Early loosening of femoral components after cemented revision: A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study
7. Early migration of femoral components revised with impacted cancellous allografts and cement: A preliminary report of five patients
8. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty
9. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening
10. Is it advantageous to strengthen the cement-metal interface and use a collar for cemented femoral components of total hip replacements
11. Measurement accuracy in acetabular cup migration: A comparison of four radiologic methods versus roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis
12. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses
13. Radiostereometry of hip prostheses
14. Subsidence of a non-polished stem in revisions of the hip using impaction allograft: Evaluation with radiostereometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
15. Revision total hip arthroplasty for aseptic failure: A review of 276 cases
16. Histology of cancellous impaction grafting in the femur: A case report
17. Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty: Digitized and conventional radiography compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients
18. Mechanical loosening of total hip prostheses: A radiographic and roentgen stereophotogrammetric study
19. Revision hip arthroplasty with the use of cement and impaction grafting: Histological analysis of four cases
20. Migration of the Charnley stem in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis
21. Early subsidence of the Exeter femoral stem within the cement mantle in primary arthroplasties and in revisions using impacted morselized allografts and cement: A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis
22. Initial stability of two different hip revision concepts: A biomechanical study
23. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry: A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system
24. Early loosening of revision hip arthroplasty: A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis
25. All Exeter femoral components showed early migration: A stereophotogrammetric study of 21 hips
26. Surgical technique and early results in revision of a total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, collarless, tapered, polished stem, and contained morselized allograft