|
Volumn 97, Issue 1-2, 2001, Pages 67-76
|
Comparison of RNA and cDNA transfection methods for rescue of infectious bursal disease virus
|
Author keywords
CDNA transfection; IBDV; MRNA transfection; Reverse genetics; SEAP
|
Indexed keywords
ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE;
COMPLEMENTARY DNA;
INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS ANTIGEN;
INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS PROTEIN;
RNA;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
VIRUS ANTIGEN;
VIRUS PROTEIN;
ANIMAL CELL;
ANTIGEN DETECTION;
ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DNA TRANSFECTION;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MOLECULAR CLONING;
MUTAGENESIS;
NONHUMAN;
NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PRODUCTIVITY;
PROTEIN EXPRESSION;
REOVIRUS;
RNA SYNTHESIS;
VIRUS RECOMBINANT;
VIRUS TITRATION;
ANIMALS;
BASE SEQUENCE;
CELL LINE;
CHICKENS;
DNA, COMPLEMENTARY;
GENES, REPORTER;
GENETIC ENGINEERING;
INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS;
MUTAGENESIS;
QUAIL;
RNA, MESSENGER;
TRANSFECTION;
VIRUS REPLICATION;
INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS;
RNA VIRUSES;
|
EID: 0034895750
PISSN: 01660934
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-0934(01)00340-8 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (23)
|