Why does primary care need more implementation research?

Family Practice

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 353-355

  Foy, Robbie ^a   Eccles, Martin ^b   Grimshaw, Jeremy ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; MODEL; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0034894043     PISSN: 02632136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/18.4.353     Document Type: Editorial

References (20)

1. Why do GPs not implement evidence-based guidelines? A descriptive study
2. Promoting evidence-based medicine in general practice-the impact of academic detailing
3. Control of blood pressure in Scotland: The rule of halves
4. Lipid concentrations and the use of lipid lowering drugs: Evidence from a national cross sectional survey
5. Use of secondary prophylaxis against myocardial infarction in the North of England
6. Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: Baseline survey of provision in general practice
7. Preventive care for patients following myocardial infarction. The Wessex Research Network (WreN)
8. Defining and measuring quality of care: A perspective from US researchers
9. Primary care research: Ends and means
10. Educational outreach visits: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
11. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: Observational study
12. Are clinical practice guidelines valid for primary care?
13. Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: What it will take to accelerate progress
14. Cluster randomised trials: Time for improvement
15. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the utilization of evidence-based guidelines
16. Changing belief in obstetrics: Impact of two multicentre randomised controlled trials
17. Salient beliefs and intentions to prescribe antibiotics for patients with a sore throat
18. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating guideline implementation strategies
19. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice