Wilsonian matching of effective field theory with underlying QCD

Physical Review D

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2001, Pages

  Harada, Masayasu ^a   Yamawaki, Koichi ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION FUNCTION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; QUANTUM CHROMODYNAMICS; QUANTUM MECHANICS; THEORY;

EID: 0034892678     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.014023     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. See, e.g., N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B435, 129 (1995).
2. M. Harada and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3374| (1999).
3. M. Bando, T. Kugo, S. Uehara, K. Yamawaki, and T.! Yanagida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1215 (1985).
4. M. Bando, T. Kugo, and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rep. 164, 217(1988).
5. J.B. Kogut and D.R. Sinclair, Nucl. Phys. B295, 465 (1988);
6. F.R. Brown, H. Chen, N.H. Christ, Z. Dong, R.D. Mawhinney,W. Shaffer, and A. Vaccarino, Phys. Rev. D 46, 5655 (1992);
7. Y. Iwasaki, K. Kanaya, S. Sakai, and T. Yoshié, Phys. Rev.Lett. 69, 21 (1992);
8. Y. Iwasaki, K. Kanaya, S. Kaya, S. Sakai,and T. Yoshié, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 131, 415 (1998).
9. T. Appelquist, J. Terning, and L.C.R. Wijewardhara, Phys.Rev. Lett. 77, 1214 (1996);
10. V.A. Miransky and K. Yamawaki,Phys. Rev. D 55, 5051 (1997).
11. R. Oehme and W. Zimmerman, Phys. Rev. D 21, 471 (1980);
12. 21, 1661 (1980).
13. M. Velkovsky and E. Shuryak, Phys. Lett. B 437, 398 (1998).
14. M. Veltman, Acta. Phys. Pol. B 12, 437 (1981).
15. M. Harada and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Lett. B 297, 151 (1992).
16. M. Tanabashi, Phys. Lett. B 316, 534 (1993).
17. M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainstein, and V.I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys.B147, 385 (1979);
18. B147, 448 (1979).
19. Such dependences are assigned to the parameters Z2(A) a°d Zi(A). This situation is similar to that for the high energy parameters in chiral perturbation theory [15J.
20. 2 term depend on the renormalization point p. of QCD, and that those generate a small dependence of the bare parameters of the HLS on fj.. It is reasonable to take p. to be equal to the matching scale A.
21. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 158, 142(1984);
22. Nucl. Phys. B250, 465 (1985).
23. The RGE for F\ for /j.
24. M. Harada and J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D 54, 3394 (1996).
25. Note that the existence of kinetic type p-y mixing from the j3term was needed to explain the experimental data of F(p-e+e~) [17J.
26. One might think of the matching by the Borel transformationof the correlators. However, agreement of the predicted values,especially gp, is not as remarkably good as that for the presentcase.
27. Particle Data Group, D.E. Groom et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 15, 1(2000).
28. G. Ecker, J. Gasser, A. Pich, and E. De Rafaël, Nucl. Phys.B321, 311 (1989).
29. See, e.g., Ref. [17J.
30. K. Kawarabayashi and M. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 255(1966);
31. Riazuddin and Fayyazuddin, Phys. Rev. 147, 1071(1966).
32. M. Bando, T. Kugo, and K. Yamawaki, Nucl. Phys. B259, 493(1985);
33. Prog. Theor. Phys. 73, 1541 (1985).
34. M. Harada, T. Kugo, and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71,1299 (1993);
35. Prog. Theor. Phys. 91, 801 (1994).
36. The contribution from the higher derivative term is neglectedin the expression of gp;r!7 given in Eq. (6.3), i.e., gpjr_=Spd«P;0,0) = gp(0;0,0).
37. The parameter choice A = //ip does not work, either.
38. M. Harada and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 757 (2001).
39. S. Weinberg, Physica A 96, 327 (1979).
40. A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B234, 189 (1984).
41. 0. Kaymakcalan and J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D 31, 1109(1985).
42. One might think that there exists a cr-tadpole contribution tothe Ä-Ä two-point function with the vertex from the secondterm of Sj£CT) in Eq. (B21). However, the vertex is exactlycanceled with the vertex from 2cr-4Jc)r-4(rCT). Thus there isno {7-tadpole contribution to the Ä-Ä two-point function.Similar cancellations occur between contributions from thefirst term of 2-4CT) and I.j'-ffitf'"'to V-V as well as toV-V.