Mammographic screening: International perspective

Seminars in Roentgenology

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 187-194

  Warren Burhenne, Linda J ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j}   Smith, Robert A ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j}   Tabar, Laszlo ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j}   Dean, Peter B ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j}   Perry, Nicholas ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j}   Sickles, Edward A ^{a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j}  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia   (Canada)

^c AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY   (United States)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e FALUN HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^g TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^h Quality Assurance Reference Centre   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EDUCATION; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW;

EID: 0034890488     PISSN: 0037198X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/sroe.2001.25120     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Parkin DM Pisani JF Global cancer statistics CA Cancer J Clin 49 1999 33 64
2. Ries L Eisner M Kosary C SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1997 2000 National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD
3. Shapiro S Venet W Strax P Periodic Screening for Breast Cancer: The Health Insurance Plan Project and its Sequelae 1988 Johns Hopkins Press Baltimore
4. Tabar L Fagerberg CJ Gad A Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare Lancet 1 1985 829 832
5. [published erratum appears in Can Med Assoc J 148:718, 1993] [see comments] Miller AB Baines CJ To T Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years Can Med Assoc J 147 1992 1459 1476
6. Alexander FE Anderson TJ Brown HK The Edinburgh randomised trial of breast cancer screening: results after 10 years of follow-up Br J Cancer 70 1994 542 548
7. Smith RA Risk-based screening for breast cancer: Is there a practical strategy? Seminars in Breast Disease 2 1999 280 291
8. Shapiro S Goldberg J Venet L Risk factors in breast cancer: A prospective study Doll R Vodopija I Host Environment Interactions in the Etiology of Cancer in Man 1973 International Agency for Research on Cancer London 169 182
9. Solin L Schwartz G Feig S Risk factors as criteria for inclusion in breast cancer, screening programs Ames F Blumenschein G Montague E Current Controversies in Breast Cancer 1984 University of Texas Press Austin
10. Alexander F Roberts M Huggins A Risk factors for breast cancer with applications to selection for the prevalence screen J Epidemiol Community Health 41 1987 101 106
11. Schechter MT Miller AB Baines CJ Selection of women at high risk of breast cancer for initial screening J Chronic Dis 39 1986 253 260
12. Paci E duffy SW Modelling the analysis of breast cancer screening programmes: Sensitivity, lead time and predictive value in the Florence District Programme (1975–1986) Int J Epidemiol 20 1991 852 858
13. Gail M Rimer B Risk-based recommendations for mammographic screening for women in their forties J Clin Oncol 16 1998 3105 3114
14. Duffy SW Tabar L Smith RA Risk of breast cancer and risks with breast cancer: The relationship between histologic type and conventional risk factors, disease progression, and survival Seminars in Breast Disease 2 1999 292 300
15. Tabar L Dean PB Kaufman CS A new era in the diagnosis of breast cancer Surg Oncol Clin North Am 9 2000 233 277
16. Tot T Tabar L Dean PB The pressing need for better histologic-mammographic correlation of the many variations in, normal breast anatomy Virchows Arch 437 2000 338 344
17. Gram IT Funkhouser E Tabar L The Tabar classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns Eur J Radiol 24 1997 131 136
18. Wellings SR Jensen HM Marcum RG An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesions J Natl Cancer Inst 55 1975 231 273
19. Hughes LE Mansel RE Webster DJ Aberrations of normal development and involution (ANDI): A new perspective on pathogenesis and nomenclature of benign, breast disorders Lancet 2 1987 1316 1319
20. Tabar L Dean PB Tot T Radiology of minimal breast cancer Haus AG Yaffe MJ RSNA Categorical Course in Breast Imaging 1999 RSNA Chicago 9 18
21. Pritchard J Quality Assurance Guidelines for Mammography 1989 National Health Service Breast Screening Programme Publication
22. Quality Assurance Guidelines for Radiologists 1990 NHSBSP Publication
23. Perry N, Broeders M, De Wolf C, et al: European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening (ed 3). European Commission Publication (in press)
24. Small Entity Compliance Guide An Overview of the final regulations implementing the Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992 1997 United States Department of Health and Human Services
25. Guidance for Purchasers Improving Outcomes in Breast Cancer 1996 The Research Evidence, NHS Executive
26. Ciatto S Ambrogetti D Catarzi S Proficiency Test for Screening Mammography: Results for 117 Volunteer Italian Radiologists J Med Screen 6 1999 149 151
27. Kan L Olivotto I Warren Burhenne L Standardised abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening programme Radiology 215 2000 563 567
28. Sickles EA Quality assurance: How to audit your own mammography practice Radiol Clin North Am 30 1992 265 275
29. Linver ML Osuch JR Brenner RJ The mammography audit: A primer for the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) AJR Am J Roentgenol 165 1995 19 25
30. Linver ML Sickles EA Follow-up and outcome monitoring D'Orsi CJ Bassett LW Feig SA Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System ed 3 1998 American College of Radiology Reston, VA 211 228
31. Dee KE Sickles EA Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: Comparison to screening outcomes obtained concurrently AJR Am J Roentgenol 176 2001 729 733
32. 18 Jul 1997 Cao F Sickles EA Huang HK Interactive digital breast imaging teaching file RSNA EJ 1 1997 26