Economic crisis and income inequality in Korea

Asian Economic Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 39-60

  Cheong, K W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Income inequality; The Gini coefficient and income distribution in Korea

Indexed keywords

CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; ECONOMIC INSTABILITY; FINANCIAL CRISIS; INCOME DISTRIBUTION;

SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 0034888469     PISSN: 13513958     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8381.00122     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Economic development and income distribution in Korea
2. Income inequality indices and deprivation: A generalization
3. A note on the interpretation and derivation of the Gini coefficient
4. A comparison of alternative functional forms for parametric estimations of the Lorenz curve
5. Symposium on the Korean financial crisis: Causes and challenge
6. Relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient: Comment
7. On a class of poverty measures
8. On measuring inequality in taxation: A new approach
9. The aftermath of the asian economic crisis for South Korea
10. Inequality decomposition analysis and the Gini coefficient revisited
11. A note on the calculation and interpretation of the Gini index
12. Social impacts of the asian crisis: Policy challenges and lessons
13. The Gini-type functions: An alternative derivation
14. Functional forms for estimating the Lorenz curve
15. Note on the decomposition of Gini inequality
16. Calculating the Gini index of inequality for individual data
17. Factor components, population subgroups and the computation of the Gini index of inequality
18. Estimation of Gini coefficients in selected (OECS) countries
19. Equivalence scales, the income distribution and federal taxes
20. Between group inequality and targeted transfers
21. On the decomposition of Gini coefficients by population class and income source: A spreadsheet approach and application
22. Relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient
23. The changes in distribution and poverty after IMF and the relevant policy examples from foreign countries