Response of interferometric detectors to scalar gravitational waves

Physical Review D

Volumn 63, Issue 8, 2001, Pages

  Nakao, Ken Ichi ^a,g   Harada, Tomohiro ^b,c   Shibata, Masaru ^c,f   Kawamura, Seiji ^b,d   Nakamura, Takashi ^e,f  

^a Osaka Prefecture University   (Japan)

^b WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^e NATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORY OF JAPAN   (Japan)

^f KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTENNA; ARTICLE; GRAVITY; INTERFEROMETRY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR PHYSICS; THEORY;

EID: 0034888271     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.082001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. S. Nagano, in Gravitational Wave Detection II, Proceedings of the 2nd TAMA Workshop, Tokyo, Japan, 1999, edited by S. Kawamura and N. Mio, 2000, p. 89;
2. M. Ando, ibid., p. 101;
3. D. Tatsumi et al., ibid., p. 113;
4. S. Telada et al., ibid., p. 129;
5. N. Kanda et al., ibid., p. 137;
6. H. Tagoshi et ai, ibid., p. 145;
7. R. Takahashi, ibid., p. 151.
8. H. Tagoshi et al., Phys. Rev. D 63, 062001 (2001).
9. A. Abramovici et ai, Science 256, 325 (1992).
10. C. Bradaschia et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 289, 518 (1990).
11. J. Hough, in Proceedings of Sixth Marcel Grossman Meeting, edited by H. Sato and T. Nakamura (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), p. 192.
12. LISA Science Team, "Laser Interferometer Space Antenna for the detection and observation of gravitational waves," report, 1995.
13. C.M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, revised edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1993).
14. P.O. Bergmann, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1, 25 (1968).
15. R.V. Wagoner, Phys. Rev. B l, 3209 (1970).
16. T. Damour and A.M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B423, 532 (1994).
17. M. Shibata, K. Nakao, and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7304 (1994).
18. T. Harada, T. Chiba, K. Nakao, and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2024 (1997).
19. J. Novak, Phys. Rev. D 57, 4789 (1998).
20. Eubanks et al.. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. Abstract #K 11.05 (1997); CM. Will, gr-qc/9811036.
21. M. Maggiore and A. Nicolis, Phys. Rev. D 62, 024004 (2000).
22. M.E. Tobar, T. Suzuki, and K. Kuroda, Phys. Rev. D 59, 102002 (1999); in this article, it was shown that two FoxSmith interferometric detectors can distinguish the scalar mode from tensor mode.
23. B.F. Schutz and C.M. Will, Astrophys. J. Lett. 291, L33 (1985).
24. M.'Saijo, H. Shinkai, and K. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 56, 785 (1997).
25. R.M. Wald, General Relativity (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984).
26. R. Schilling, Class. Quantum Grav. 14, 1513 (1997).
27. Here we should comment on the applicability of the results obtained in this article. The optical configurations considered in this article are not the same as LISA or GEO600 while TAMA300, LIGO, and VIRGO are the FP type detector studied in Sec. VI. Thus the antenna sensitivity pattern obtained in this article cannot be directly applied to LISA and GEO600, although our derivation will be easily extended to these cases.