![]() |
Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 250-257
|
MR features of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: Can a calculated index compete with radiologist's experience?
a a a a a a |
Author keywords
MR; Neoplasms; Nerves; Nervous system; Soft tissue; Statistical analysis
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CALCULATION;
CHILD;
CLINICAL FEATURE;
COMPETITION;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS;
EXPERIENCE;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INFANT;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
NERVE CELL NETWORK;
NERVE SHEATH TUMOR;
NEUROGENIC TUMOR;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PERIPHERAL NERVE TUMOR;
PREDICTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS;
RADIOLOGIST;
RANDOMIZATION;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
SCORING SYSTEM;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SOFT TISSUE TUMOR;
VALIDATION PROCESS;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
CHILD;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INFANT;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NERVE SHEATH NEOPLASMS;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SOFT TISSUE NEOPLASMS;
|
EID: 0034879944
PISSN: 09387994
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s003300000552 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (14)
|
References (31)
|