Sluggish movement and repugnant odor are positively interacting insect defensive traits in encounters with frogs

Journal of Insect Behavior

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 479-496

  Hatle, John D ^a   Salazar, Brent A ^a   Whitman, Douglas W ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambush predator; Aposematic; Chemical defense; Defensive ensemble; Gregarious; Lubber grasshopper

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034873383     PISSN: 08927553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1011172006035     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Tracking the evolution of warning signals
2. Key stimuli of prey for toads (Bufo bufo L): Configuration and movement patterns
3. Experimental studies of mimicry. 6. The reactions of toads (Bufo terrestris) to honeybees (Apis mellifera) and their dronefly mimics (Eristalis vinetorum)
4. Experimental studies of mimicry 5. The reactions of toads (Bufo terrestris) to bumblebees (Bombus americanorum) and their robberfly mimics (Mallphora bomboides), with a discussion of aggressive mimicry
5. Predation and the flight, morphology, and temperature of neotropical rain-forest butterflies
6. Prey odor detection by teiid and lacertid lizards and the relationship of prey odor detection to foraging mode in lizard families
7. The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies. II. Reactions of naive birds to novel insects
8. Chemical defenses against predation in arthropods
9. Defense against predators
10. Neuroethology of releasing mechanisms: Prey catching in toads
11. Why do warningly-coloured prey live gregariously?
12. Evidence for a more effective signal in aggregated aposematic prey
13. Aposematism and gregariousness: The combined effect of group size and coloration on signal repellence
14. Why are distasteful prey not cryptic?
15. Frequency-dependent selection on aposematic prey: Some experiments
16. The evolution of aposematism
17. Slow movement increases the survivorship of a chemically defended grasshopper in predatory encounters
18. Aposematic coloration of gregarious insects can delay predation by an ambush predator
19. Inter-individual variation in sequestration (as measured by energy dispersive spectroscopy) predicts efficacy of defensive secretion in lubber grasshoppers
20. Reduction in diet breadth results in sequestration of plant chemicals and increases efficacy of chemical defense in a generalist grasshopper
21. Importance of olfaction to suppression of attack response through conditioned taste aversion in the grasshopper mouse
22. Effects of novelty and gregariousness in survival of aposematic prey
23. Aerial predation and butterfly design: How palatability, mimicry, and the need for evasive flight constrain mass allocation
24. The relative importance of colour, taste and smell in the protection of an aposematic insect Coccinella septempunctata
25. Chemical ecology of the defense of two nymphalid butterfly larvae against ants
26. The chemical ecology of defense in arthropods
27. The function of multiple anti-predator mechanisms in adult tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cinindelidae)
28. What is the adaptive significance of multicomponent defensive repertoires?
29. A simple test of prey discrimination that demonstrates learning in postlarval ranid frogs
30. Conspicuousness of distasteful prey affects the strength and durability of one-trial avoidance learning
31. Aposematic colouration and avoidance learning in chicks
32. Evidence for a role for olfactory cues in the feeding response of leopard frogs, Rana pipiens
33. Higher survival of an aposematic than a cryptic form of a distasteful bug
34. Do predators avoid groups of aposematic prey? An experimental test
35. The evolution of aposematic coloration in distasteful prey: An individual selection model
36. Olfactory and visual cues in the feeding behavior of the leopard frog (Rana pipiens)
37. Collective security: Aggregation by insects as a defense
38. Survival of distasteful insects after being attacked by naïve birds: A reappraisal of the theory of aposematic coloration evolving through individual selection
39. Laboratory biology of Taeniopoda eques (Orthoptera: Acrididae)
40. Grasshopper chemical communication
41. Chemical defense in Taeniopoda eques (Orthoptera: Acrididae): Role of the metathoracic secretion
42. Allomones: Chemicals for defense
43. Defensive secretion production in lubber grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Romaleidae): Influence of age, sex, diet, and discharge frequency