Interobserver disagreements on clinical dementia rating assessment: Interpretation and implications for training

Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 155-161

  Tractenberg, Rochelle E ^a,c   Schafer, Kimberly ^a   Morris, John C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical Dementia Rating; Dementia staging; Training

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DEMENTIA RATING; DEMENTIA; DISEASE SEVERITY; HOME; LEISURE; MEMORY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; STAFF TRAINING;

ADULT; AGED; DEMENTIA; HUMANS; MEMORY DISORDERS; MENTAL STATUS SCHEDULE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 0034872658     PISSN: 08930341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002093-200107000-00007     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Reliability of the Washington University Clinical Dementia Rating
2. Alternative calculation of the global Clinical Dementia Rating
3. Reliability of clinical nurse specialists in the staging of dementia
4. The Clinical Dementia Rating: Current version and scoring rules
5. Clinical Dementia Rating
6. Clinical Dementia Rating training and reliability in multicenter studies: The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study experience
7. Agreement on CDR ratings by committee