Multiple-reader studies, digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis-and the holy grail of imaging physics (I)

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 4320, Issue , 2001, Pages 611-618

  Wagner, R F ^a   Beiden, S V ^a   Campbell, G ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEMS; MEDICAL IMAGING; SENSOR DATA FUSION;

COMPUTER PROCESSING ALGORITHM; DATA FUSION ALGORITHM; IMAGING PHYSICS; MAKING EFFECT; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0034867072     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.430881     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Medical imaging: The assessment of image quality
2. Toward consensus on quantitative assessment of medical imaging systems
3. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging
4. The central problem in the study of radiographic image quality
5. Basic principles of ROC analysis
6. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms
7. Letter to the Editor: Variability in the interpretation of mammograms
8. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging
9. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies
10. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists
11. Do radiologists have the same detection accuracy interpreting first screening mammograms?
12. Gains in accuracy from replicated readings of diagnostic images: Prediction and assessment in terms of ROC analysis
13. Variance-component modeling in the analysis of receiver operating characteristic index estimates
14. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method
15. Advances in statistical methods for diagnostic radiology: A symposium
16. Components-of-variance models and multiple-bootstrap experiments: An alternative methodology for random-effects ROC analysis
17. Implications of a "noisy" observer to data processing techniques
18. Non-inferiority study of FFDM in an enriched diagnostic cohort: Comparison with screen-film mammography in 625 women
19. Interim clinical evaluation of FFDM in a screening cohort: Comparison with screen-film mammography in 4,965 exams
20. A proposed design and analysis for comparing digital and analog mammography: Special ROC methods for cancer screening
21. Full-field digital mammography: A candid assessment
22. Study design in the evaluation of breast cancer imaging technologies
23. Multiple-reader studies, digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis-and the Holy Grail of imaging physics (II)