A cutting edge technology, or is it?

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 680-681

  King III, Spencer B ^a,b  

^a Fuqua Heart Center   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOPLASTY; BETA RADIATION; BRACHYTHERAPY; CORONARY STENT; EDITORIAL; GAMMA RADIATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTENOSIS; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY DISEASE; HUMANS; RECURRENCE; STENTS;

EID: 0034857207     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01457-7     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1993 Guidelines for Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty)
2. In-stent restenosis: "The great equalizer"-disappointing outcomes with all interventional strategies
3. Cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: A matched comparison with rotational atherectomy, additional stent implantation and balloon angioplasty
4. Rotational atherectomy versus balloon angioplasty for diffuse in-stent restenosis: Preliminary results of a randomized multicenter trial (ARTIST Trial)