New answers to old questions: Explaining the slow adoption of ring spinning in Lancashire, 1890-1913

Journal of Economic History

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 439-466

  Leunig, T ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST; INDUSTRIAL HISTORY; INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; TEXTILE INDUSTRY;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0034853856     PISSN: 00220507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022050701028078     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Market organization, protection, and vertical integration: German cotton textiles before 1914
2. Output growth and the British industrial revolution: A restatement of the Crafts-Harley view
3. th century
4. The emergence of Victorian Oldham as the centre of the cotton spinning industry
5. Skilled labour and the choice of technique in Edwardian industry
6. The growth of world industry
7. Foreign trade and economic growth: Lessons from Britian and France, 1850-1913
8. Factor costs and the diffusion of ring spinning prior to World War I
9. Production relations, labor productivity, and choice of technique: British and US cotton spinning
10. Industrial organization and technological change: The decline of the British cotton industry
11. Rings and mules in Britain: Reply
12. Stubborn mules: Some comments
13. The performance of the British cotton industry, 1870-1913
14. The British cotton industry and international competitive advantage: The state of the debates
15. The great depression in Britain, 1873-1896: A reappraisal
16. American rings and English mules: The role of economic rationality
17. The remembrance of things past: Rings and mules revisited
18. New evidence on the stubborn English mule and the cotton industry, 1878-1920
19. Stubborn mules and vertical integration: The disappearing constraint