A comparison of gravimetric techniques for measuring subsurface void signals

Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 433-443

  Romaides, Anestis J ^a   Battis, James C ^a   Sands, Roger W ^a,d   Zorn, Alan ^b   Benson Jr , Donald O ^b,e   DiFrancesco, Daniel J ^c  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b DYNAMICS RESEARCH CORPORATION   (United States)

^c Lockheed Martin Bell Aerospace Operations   (United States)

^d USAF   (United States)

^e MITRE CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MILITARY APPLICATIONS; MISSILES;

SUBSURFACE VOID SIGNALS;

GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034825292     PISSN: 00223727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/34/3/331     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Edwards A J, Maki J T and Peterson D G 1996 Gravity and gravity gradient anomalies report Vandenberg Minuteman Launch Control Facilities
2. Forsberg R and Tscherning CC 1981 The use of height data in gravity field approximation by collocation J. Geophys. Res. 86 7843-54
3. Jekeli C 1988 The Gravity Gradiometer Survey System (GGSS) EOS 69 105, 116-17
4. Longman I M 1959 Formulas for computing the tidal accelerations due to the moon and the sun J. Geophys. Res. 64 3487
5. National Imagery and Mapping Agency 1997 MAF-EO site gradiometer test (Vandenberg AFB, California, June 1997) Publication VAFB-97-016
6. Telford W M, Geldart L P, Sheriff R E and Keys D A 1976 Applied Geophysics (New York: Cambridge University Press)
7. Weast R C and Astle M J (eds) 1979 CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press)