`Gate effect' of thin layer of molecularly-imprinted poly(methacrylic acid-co-ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate)

Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 49-53

  Yoshimi, Yasuo ^a   Ohdaira, Ryo ^a   Iiyama, Chiaki ^a   Sakai, Kiyotaka ^b  

^a SHIBAURA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIC VOLTAMMETRY; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; PLASTIC FILMS; POLYACRYLATES; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID;

COPOLYMERS;

EID: 0034818821     PISSN: 09254005     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-4005(00)00671-7     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. G. Wulff, Biorecognition in molecularly imprinted polymers, in: T. Ngo (Ed.), Molecular Interactions in Bioseparations, Plenum Press, New York, USA, 1993, pp. 363-381.
2. D.J. O'Shannessy, B. Ekberg, L.I. Andersson, K. Mosbach, Recent advances in the preparation and use of molecularly imprinted polymers for enantiomeric resolution of amino acid derivatives, J. Chromatogr. 470 (1989) 391-399.
3. L.I. Andersson, K. Mosbach, Enantiomeric resolution on molecularly imprinted polymers prepared with only non-covalent and non-ionic interactions, J. Chromatogr. 516 (1990) 313-322.
4. J. Mathew-Krotz, K.J. Shea, Imprinted polymer membranes for the selective transport of targeted neutral molecules, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 8154-8155.
5. H.Y. Wang, T. Kobayashi, N. Fujii, Molecular imprint membranes prepared by the phase inversion precipitation technique, Langmuir 12 (1996) 4850-4856.
6. G. Vlatakis, L.I. Andersson, R. Müller, K. Mosbach, Drug assay using antibody mimics made by molecular imprinting, Nature 361 (1993) 645-647.
7. D. Kriz, K. Mosbach, Competitive amperometric morphine sensor based on an agarose immobilized molecularly imprinted polymer, Anal. Chim. Acta 300 (1995) 71-75.
8. E. Hedborg, F. Winquist, I. Lundström, L.I. Andersson, K. Mosbach, Some studies of molecularly-imprinted polymer membranes in combination with field-effect devices, Sens. Actuators A 37/38 (1993) 796-799.
9. S.A. Piletsky, E.V. Piletskaya, T.L. Panasyuk, A.V. El'skaya, R. Levi, I. Karube, G. Wulff, Imprinted membranes for sensor technology: opposite behavior of covalently and noncovalently imprinted membranes, Macromolecules 31 (1998) 2137-2140.
10. A.J. Bard, L.R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley, New York, USA, 1980, Chapter 6, pp. 213-248.
11. O.M.-R. Chyan, K. Rajeshwar, Heterojunction photoelectrodes II. Electrochemistry at tin-doped indium oxide/aqueous electrolyte interfaces, J. Electrochem. Soc. 132 (1985) 2109-2115.
12. S.A. Piletsky, E.V. Piletskaya, K. Yano, A. Kugimiya, A.V. Elgersma, R. Levi, U. Kahlow, T. Takeuchi, I. Karube, A biomimetic receptor system for sialic acid based on molecular imprinting, Anal. Lett. 29 (1996) 157-170.
13. K. Odashima, M. Sugawara, Y. Umezawa, Channel mimetic sensing membranes based on host-guest molecular recognition by synthetic receptors, in: T.E. Mallouk, D. J. Harrison (Eds.), Interfacial Design and Chemical Sensing, ACS Symposium Series 561, Washington, DC, USA, 1994, pp. 123-134.
14. R.M. Sutherland, C. Dähne, IRS devices for optical immunoassays, in: A.P.F. Turner, I. Karube, G.S. Wilson (Eds.), Biosensors, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, UK, 1987, pp. 655-678.