Does the sunset of Mental Health Parity really matter?

Administration and Policy in Mental Health

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 353-369

  Gitterman, Daniel P ^a   Sturm, Roland ^b   Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo ^b   Scheffler, Richard M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Congress; Employer sponsored health insurance; Mental Health Parity Act; Regulation; State legislature

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; LAW; MANAGED CARE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; PARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

HEALTH BENEFIT PLANS, EMPLOYEE; HUMANS; INSURANCE, PSYCHIATRIC; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; SOCIAL JUSTICE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034815775     PISSN: 0894587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1011113932599     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. The politics and economics of mental health 'parity' laws
2. Parity for mental health and substance abuse care under managed care
3. Why mental health parity in the U.S.? Political and economic determinants of policy change
4. Managed behavioral health services for children under carve-out contracts
5. Early experience with 'New Federalism' in health insurance regulation
6. How expensive is unlimited mental health care coverage under managed care?
7. State mental health parity legislation: Cause or consequence of utilization differences?