Evidence marshaling for imaginative fact investigation

Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn 9, Issue 2-3, 2001, Pages 165-188

  Schum, D A ^a  

^a George Mason University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; DATA REDUCTION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; HEURISTIC METHODS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; STATISTICAL METHODS;

EVIDENCE MARSHALING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 0034815539     PISSN: 09248463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1017941304013     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Horns, hooves, insteps: Some hypotheses on three types of abduction
2. A testimonial from professor einstein
3. Bayesian networks for knowledge discovery
4. Sherlock holmes confronts modern logic: Toward a theory of information-seeking through questioning
5. Sherlock holmes formalized
6. Inferential theory of learning: Developing foundations for multistrategy learning
7. Abduction and induction
8. Perceptual judgments
9. A probabilistic causal model for diagnostic problem solving, Parts I and II
10. Mathematical creation
11. Knowledge, credibility, and probability
12. Hearsay from a layperson
13. Marshaling evidence for adversary litigation
14. Does scientific discovery have a logic?
15. Charting new territory in judicial proof: Beyond wigmore
16. The problem of proof
17. The science of judicial proof: As given by logic