|
Volumn 45, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 967-970
|
A comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 1% mepivacaine for sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa
|
Author keywords
Local anesthetics; Lower limb orthopedic surgery; Mepivacaine; Nerve block; Popliteal nerve block; Ropivacaine
|
Indexed keywords
MEPIVACAINE;
ROPIVACAINE;
ADULT;
ANESTHESIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES;
ANESTHETIC RECOVERY;
ANKLE;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
DRUG EFFICACY;
DRUG SAFETY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
NERVE BLOCK;
NERVE STIMULATION;
POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SCIATIC NERVE;
SURGICAL APPROACH;
ADULT;
AGED;
AMIDES;
ANKLE;
DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MEPIVACAINE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NERVE BLOCK;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SCIATIC NERVE;
|
EID: 0034815396
PISSN: 00015172
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450808.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (21)
|
References (15)
|