|
Volumn 139, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 387-392
|
High tibial osteotomy, unicompartmental or bicompartmental knee arthroplasty methods for the treatment of unicampartmental osteoarthritis - A cost-comparison analysis;Valgisierende tibiakopfumstellung, monokondyläre schlittenprothese oder bikondylärer gleitflächenersatz zur therapie der medialen gonarthrose - Eine kostenstrukturanalyse
a a a a a |
Author keywords
Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Cost comparison analysis; High tibial valgus osteotomy; Total knee arthroplasty; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;
MALE;
OSTEOARTHRITIS;
OSTEOTOMY;
SURVIVAL RATE;
TIBIA OSTEOTOMY;
TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
AMBULATORY CARE;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
GERMANY;
HOSPITAL COSTS;
HUMANS;
KNEE PROSTHESIS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE;
OSTEOTOMY;
PROSTHESIS DESIGN;
|
EID: 0034813049
PISSN: 00443220
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-17979 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (5)
|
References (26)
|