Thin co-radial bipolar leads: Technology and clinical performance

Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 148-157

  Fahraeus, T ^a   Israel, C W ^b   Wollenstein M ^c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

^c Guidant Corporation   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bipolar leads; Conductors; Insulation material; Lead technology; Pacemaker leads

Indexed keywords

ETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; ETHYLENE TETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

COMPRESSION; CONDUCTOR; ELECTRICITY; FOLLOW UP; FORCE; HEART PACING; IMPEDANCE; PACEMAKER ELECTRODE; REVIEW;

EID: 0034797498     PISSN: 09387412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s003990170019     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Cardiac pacing leads
2. Reliability of endocardial implantable leads
3. Insulation lead failure: Is it a matter of insulation coating, venous approach, or both?
4. Anatomical and morphological evaluation of pacemaker lead compression
5. Anatomical mechanisms explaining damage to pacemaker leads, defibrillator leads, and failure of central venous catheters adjacent to the sternoclavicular joint
6. Endocardial pacing leads: The good, the bad, and the ugly
7. Multicenter experience with a bipolar tined polyurethane ventricular lead
8. Appraisal of pacing lead performance from the Danish pacemaker register
9. Danish pacemaker and ICD register
10. Jahresbericht 1999 des Deutschen Zentralregisters Herzschrittmacher
11. Comparison of spontaneous atrial fibrillation electrogram potentials with the P-wave electrogram amplitude in dual chamber pacing with unipolar atrial sensing
12. Should unipolar leads be implanted in the atrium? A Holter electrocardiographic comparison of threshold adapted unipolar and high sensitivity bipolar sensing
13. Should unipolar pacemaker leads be banned? Lessons from pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator interactions
14. In vivo testing of a biostable polyurethane
15. Degradation of polyurethane endocardial pacing leads: An 8 year retrospective analysis
16. Advances in pacing lead technology
17. Polyurethane versus silicone rubber insulation: Is stiffness and handling more important than long term reliability
18. Thin bipolar pacing: Distrust! Stimucoeur
19. Thin bipolar leads: A solution to problems with coaxial bipolar designs
20. Performance and handling of a new ultrathin bipolar screw-in lead with coated tip
21. Bipolar active fixation atrial leads: Comparison of two new lead models
22. Clinical surveillance of a thin bipolar pacing lead
23. Clinical experience with passive-fixation coradial bipolar endocardial pacing leads
24. Clinical evaluation of a thin bipolar pacing lead
25. Initial experience with a co-radial bipolar pacing lead
26. Bipolar leads for use with permanently implantable cardiac pacing systems: A review of limitations of traditional and coaxial configurations and the development and testing of new conductor, insulation, and electrode designs
27. Acute and long-term ventricular stimulation thresholds with a new, iridium oxidecoated electrode
28. Lead failure due to the subclavian crush syndrome in a patient implanted with both standard and thin bipolar spiral wound leads
29. Experience with a low profile bipolar, active fixation lead in pediatric patients