Hip arthroscopy in athletes

Clinics in Sports Medicine

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 749-762

  Thomas Byrd, J W ^a,b   Jones, Kay S ^a  

^a Nashville Sports Medicine & Orthopaedic Center   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTHROSCOPY; ATHLETE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE COURSE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HIP INJURY; HUMAN; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SPORT INJURY;

EID: 0034797285     PISSN: 02785919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-5919(05)70282-9     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Hip arthroscopy for post-traumatic loose fragments in the young active adult: Three case reports
2. Indications and contraindications
3. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy
4. Hip arthroscopy utilizing the supine position
5. The supine position
6. Labral lesions: An elusive source of hip pain: Case reports and review of the literature
7. Arthroscopy of select hip lesions
8. Lesions of the acetabular labrum: Accuracy of MR imaging and MR arthrography in detection and staging
9. Posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip: Comparison of open and closed methods of treatment in certain types
10. Posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip: Long-term followup
11. Hip arthroscopy for degenerative joint disease
12. Hip arthroscopy for acetabular labrum tears
13. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation
14. Acetabular labral tears: Evaluation with MR arthrography
15. Improvement of full-thickness chondral defect healing in the human knee after debridement and microfracture using continuous passive motion
16. Indications and surgical treatment of hip pathology
17. How do traditional hip scoring systems correlate with validated disease specific and general health outcome measures?
18. Arthroscopic debridement of the hip: A minimally invasive approach to osteoarthritis
19. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness