메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 145-148

General practitioners and prenatal testing - Follow the experts or scrutinise the issue?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMNIOCENTESIS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; EDITORIAL; FETUS DISEASE; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL SCREENING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY;

EID: 0034796887     PISSN: 02813432     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/028134301316982324     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (3)

References (30)
  • 1
    • 0034603482 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence-based screening for Down syndrome. We should be prepared to re-examine entrenched practices
    • (2000) BMJ , vol.320 , pp. 592-593
    • Raeburn, S.1
  • 3
    • 0025913958 scopus 로고
    • Prenatal genetic testing and screening: Constructing needs and reinforcing inequities
    • (1991) Am J Law Med , vol.17 , pp. 15-50
    • Lippman, A.1
  • 5
    • 0032511461 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Screening for nuchal translucency. Having the test gives parents options
    • (1998) BMJ , vol.317 , pp. 749
    • Nicolaides, K.1
  • 14
    • 0030934536 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ultrasonographic "soft markers" of fetal chromosomal defects. Detecting them may do more harm than good
    • (1997) BMJ , vol.314 , pp. 918
    • Whittle, M.1
  • 25
    • 0034639758 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Psychological consequences for parents of false negative results on prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: Retrospective interview study
    • (2000) BMJ , vol.320 , pp. 407-412
    • Hall, S.1    Bobrow, M.2    Marteau, T.M.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.