Cleaner Production perspectives 1: CP and industrial development

Industry and Environment

Volumn 24, Issue 1-2, 2001, Pages 28-32

  Van Berkel, René ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034780642     PISSN: 03789993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Perkins, J. (1997) An Examination of Incentives and Obstacles for Pollution Prevention in the Petroleum Industry, Research Paper No. 87, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C.
2. Van Berkel, R., E. Willems and M. Lafleur (1997) The Relationship between Cleaner Production and Industrial Ecology, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 51-66.
3. A useful compilation of concepts and comparison of their content can be found in J. Van Weenen, Waste Prevention: Theory and practice, PhD Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 1990.
4. There is growing evidence that this deadlock is already occurring, e.g. in the United States (J. Hirschhorn, Why the Pollution Prevention Revolution Failed and Why it Ultimately Will Succeed, Pollution Prevention Review, winter 1997, pp. 11-31) and The Netherlands (T. De Bruijn and P. Hofman, Pollution prevention and Industrial Transformation: evoking structural changes within companies, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 8, pp. 215-223; H. Dieleman, The Cleaner Production Arena: Man and organization between preservation and innovation (in Dutch), PhD Thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 1999).
5. There is growing evidence that this deadlock is already occurring, e.g. in the United States (J. Hirschhorn, Why the Pollution Prevention Revolution Failed and Why it Ultimately Will Succeed, Pollution Prevention Review, winter 1997, pp. 11-31) and The Netherlands (T. De Bruijn and P. Hofman, Pollution prevention and Industrial Transformation: evoking structural changes within companies, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 8, pp. 215-223; H. Dieleman, The Cleaner Production Arena: Man and organization between preservation and innovation (in Dutch), PhD Thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 1999).
6. There is growing evidence that this deadlock is already occurring, e.g. in the United States (J. Hirschhorn, Why the Pollution Prevention Revolution Failed and Why it Ultimately Will Succeed, Pollution Prevention Review, winter 1997, pp. 11-31) and The Netherlands (T. De Bruijn and P. Hofman, Pollution prevention and Industrial Transformation: evoking structural changes within companies, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 8, pp. 215-223; H. Dieleman, The Cleaner Production Arena: Man and organization between preservation and innovation (in Dutch), PhD Thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 1999).
7. For information on dry cleaning technologies and their alternatives, see, for example: Cleaner Technologies Substitutes Assessment for Professional Fabricare Processes, United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 744-B-98-001, Washington, D.C., 1998.
8. This approach has already been taken by the WBCSD in its definition of eco-efficiency (see, for example, Eco-Efficient Leadership for Improved Economic and Environmental Performance, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland, 1995).
9. Verfaillie, H. and R. Bidwell (2000) Measuring Eco-Efficiency: A guide to reporting company performance, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland.
10. See, for example, A. Clayton, G. Spinardi and R. Williams, Policies for Cleaner Technology: A new agenda for government and industry, Earthscan Publications, London, 1999.
11. Van Berkel, R. (2000) Cleaner Production in Australia: Revolutionary strategy or incremental tool? Australian Journal of Environmental Management, September, pp. 9-24.
12. See, for example, R. Van Berkel, Cleaner Production in Practice, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996; L. Rowledge, et al. Mapping the Journey, Greenleaf Publishers, Sheffield, UK, 1999; G. Keijzers, The Evolution of Dutch Environmental Policy: The changing ecological arena from 1970-2000 and beyond, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 8 (2000), pp. 179-200; P. Weaver, et al. Sustainable Technology Development, Greenleaf Publishers, Sheffield, UK, 2000.
13. See, for example, R. Van Berkel, Cleaner Production in Practice, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996; L. Rowledge, et al. Mapping the Journey, Greenleaf Publishers, Sheffield, UK, 1999; G. Keijzers, The Evolution of Dutch Environmental Policy: The changing ecological arena from 1970-2000 and beyond, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 8 (2000), pp. 179-200; P. Weaver, et al. Sustainable Technology Development, Greenleaf Publishers, Sheffield, UK, 2000.
14. See, for example, R. Van Berkel, Cleaner Production in Practice, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996; L. Rowledge, et al. Mapping the Journey, Greenleaf Publishers, Sheffield, UK, 1999; G. Keijzers, The Evolution of Dutch Environmental Policy: The changing ecological arena from 1970-2000 and beyond, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 8 (2000), pp. 179-200; P. Weaver, et al. Sustainable Technology Development, Greenleaf Publishers, Sheffield, UK, 2000.
15. See, for example, R. Van Berkel, Cleaner Production in Practice, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996; L. Rowledge, et al. Mapping the Journey, Greenleaf Publishers, Sheffield, UK, 1999; G. Keijzers, The Evolution of Dutch Environmental Policy: The changing ecological arena from 1970-2000 and beyond, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 8 (2000), pp. 179-200; P. Weaver, et al. Sustainable Technology Development, Greenleaf Publishers, Sheffield, UK, 2000.