|
Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 197-202
|
Cross-sectional imaging in uret er tumors: Findings and staging accuracy of various modalities
|
Author keywords
Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Tumor; Ultrasonography; Ureter
|
Indexed keywords
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PATIENT MONITORING;
TUMORS;
ULTRASONICS;
ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
MEDICAL IMAGING;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CANCER INVASION;
CANCER LOCALIZATION;
CANCER STAGING;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DEVICE;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;
ECHOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
HISTOPATHOLOGY;
HUMAN;
HUMAN TISSUE;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LYMPHADENOPATHY;
MALE;
METASTASIS;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PARAAORTIC LYMPH NODE;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
URETER TUMOR;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL;
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LYMPHATIC METASTASIS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS;
NEOPLASM STAGING;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
URETERAL NEOPLASMS;
|
EID: 0034778654
PISSN: 08997071
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0899-7071(01)00291-1 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (11)
|
References (8)
|