Autocapture compatibility in patients with the MembraneEX lead and Affinity pulse generators

Europace

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 332-335

  Schuchert, Andreas ^a   Voitk, J ^b   Liu, B ^c   Kolk, R ^d   Stammwitz, E ^e   Beiras, J ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b Mustamae Hospital   (Estonia)

^c St Jude Medical AB ^*  (Sweden)

^d TARTU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Estonia)

^e District Hospital Leer   (Germany)

^f HOSPITAL XERAL CÍES   (Spain)

Author keywords

Evoked response amplitude; High impedance small surface area electrode; Lead polarization; Pacing threshold; Ventricular Autocapture activation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEART VENTRICLE PACING; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE GENERATOR;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 0034774467     PISSN: 10995129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/eupc.2001.0181     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Automatic adjustment of pacemaker stimulation output correlated with continuously monitored capture thresholds: A multicenter study
2. Long-term benefits of autocapture - Four year of follow-up
3. Autocapture Activation without the Intraoperative Evaluation of the Evoked Response Amplitude
4. Evaluation of the compatibility of various bipolar pacing leads with Autocapture
5. Polarization signal and evoked response characteristics in current endocardial electrodes
6. Early complication of permanent pacemaker implantation: No difference between dual and single chamber systems
7. Complications related to permanent pacemaker therapy