|
Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2001, Pages 748-752
|
Is the Greulich and Pyle atlas still valid for Dutch Caucasian children today?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGE;
ARTICLE;
BONE AGE;
BONE RADIOGRAPHY;
CAUCASIAN;
CHILD;
CHILD CARE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORRELATION FUNCTION;
FEMALE;
HAND RADIOGRAPHY;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
MALE;
MEDICAL ASSESSMENT;
NORMAL HUMAN;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
POPULATION RESEARCH;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RADIOLOGIST;
RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT;
RELIABILITY;
SCORING SYSTEM;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGE DETERMINATION BY SKELETON;
AGE FACTORS;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
CHILD;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP;
FEMALE;
HAND;
HUMANS;
MALE;
NETHERLANDS;
REFERENCE VALUES;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 0034769373
PISSN: 03010449
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s002470100531 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (83)
|
References (24)
|