Effects of hydrological regime on the drift algae in a regulated mediterranean river (River Verdon, southeastern France)

River Research and Applications

Volumn 17, Issue 4-5, 2001, Pages 407-416

  Bertrand, Céline ^a   Siauve, Véronique ^a   Fayolle, Stéphanie ^a   Cazaubon, Arlette ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Drift algae; Flow; Mediterranean river; Regulated sector

Indexed keywords

ALGAE;

ALGA; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; DAM; DRIFT BEHAVIOR; FLOW REGULATION; HYDROLOGICAL REGIME;

FRANCE;

EID: 0034763417     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rrr.654     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Acs E, Kiss KT. 1993. Effects of water discharge on periphyton abundance and diversity in a large river (River Danube, Hungary). Hydrobiologia 249: 125-133.
2. Angeli N. 1980. Interactions entre la qualité des eaux et les éléments de son plancton. In La pollution des eaux continentales, Pesson P (ed.). Paris; 97-145.
3. Barbe J. 1986. Développement des peuplements phytoplanctoniques dans les canaux de navigation. Influence de la fréquentation. Science de l'eau 5: 345-360.
4. Berger C. 1975. Occurence of Oscillatoria aghardii in some shallow anthropic lakes. Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 19: 2689-2697.
5. Biggs BJF, Close ME. 1989. Periphyton biomass dynamics in gravel bed rivers: the relative effects of flows and nutrients. Freshwater Biology 22: 209-231.
6. Bormans M, Maier H, Burch M, Baker P. 1997. Temperature stratification in the lower River Murray, Australia: implication for cyanobacterial bloom development. Marine and Freshwater Research 48: 647-654.
7. Bourrelly P. 1966. Les algues d'eau douce. Initiation à la systématique. 1: les algues renés. Paris Boubée; 511.
8. Bourrelly P. 1968. Les algues d'eau douce. Initiation à la systématique. 2: les algues jaunes et brunes. Paris Boubée; 438.
9. Bourrelly P. 1970. Les algues d'eau douce. Initiation à la systématique. 3: les algues bleues et rouges, les Eugléniens, Péridinlens et Cryptomonadines. Paris Boubée; 512.
10. Cazaubon A, Giudicelli J. 1999. Impact of the residual flow on the physical characteristics and benthic community (algae, invertebrates) of a regulated Mediterranean river: the Durance, France. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 15: 441-461.
11. Champeau A, Grégoire A, Lamberti E, Millerioux E, Bressac Y, Santucci J, Nino A, Tourenq JN, Gallissian A, Giani N, Brun G, Mattera G, Collomb P. 1982. Les retenues hydro-électriques du Verdon: impact sur la rivière, conséquences du marnage. Bulletin d'Ecologie 13(2): 203-239.
12. Décamps H, Capblancq J, Casanova H, Tourenq N. 1979. Hydrobiology of some regulated rivers in the Southwest of France. In The Ecology of Regulated Streams, Ward JV, Stanford JA (eds). Plenum Press: New York; 273-288.
13. Descy JP. 1987. Phytoplankton composition and dynamics in the River Meuse (Belgium). Archive für Hydrobiologie 78(Suppl): 225-245.
14. Descy JP. 1993. Ecology of the phytoplankton of the River Moselle: effects of disturbances on community structure and diversity. Hydrobiologia 249: 111-116.
15. Dufford RG, Zimmerman HJ, Cline LC, Ward JV. 1987. Responses of epilithic algae to regulation of Rocky Mountain streams. In Regulated Streams, Craig JF, Kemper JB (eds). Plenum Press: New York; 383-390.
16. Fayolle S, Cazaubon A, Comte K, Franquet E. 1998. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: application of this concept to the response of epilithon in a regulated Mediterranean river (Lower-Durance, southeastern France). Archive für Hydrobiologie 143(1): 57-77.
17. Fayolle S, Cazaubon A, Comte K. 1999. Réponses et stratégies d'adaptation des communautés algales épilithiques àdifférents régimes hydrologiques. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences 322: 413-422.
18. Friedrich G, Viehweg M. 1984. Recent developments of the phytoplankton and its activity in the lower Rhine. Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 22: 2029-2035.
19. Frontier S. 1982. Stratégie d'échantillonnage en écologie. Masson P.U.L: Québec; 494.
20. Garnier J, Billen G, Coste M. 1995. Seasonal succession of diatoms and Chlorophyceae in the drainage network of the River Seine: observations and modeling. Limnology and Oceanography 40: 750-765.
21. Huff DR. 1986. Phytoplankton communities in Navigation Pool No. 7 of the upper Mississippi River. Hydrobiologia 136: 47-56.
22. Ibelings B, Admiraal W, Bijkerk R, lestswaart T, Prins H. 1998. Monitoring of algae in Dutch rivers: does it meet its goals? Journal of Applied Phycology 10:171-181.
23. Kiss KT. 1984. Relationship between the chemical oxygen demand, suspended matter content and algal count in the eastern main canal (Hungary). Tiscia/Szeged 19: 39-48.
24. Kiss K. 1987. Phytoplankton studies in the Szigetköz section of the Danube. Algological Studies 47: 247-273.
25. Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1986. Süibwasserflora ion Mitteleuropa. Bacillariophyceae, 1. Teil: Navicidaceae. Gustav Fisher: Stuttgart; 876 pp.
26. Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1988. Sübwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Bacillariophyceae, 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. Gustav Fisher: Stuttgart; 596 pp.
27. Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1991 a. Sübwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Bacillariophyceae, 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. Gustav Fisher: Stuttgart; 576 pp.
28. Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1991b. Sübwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Bacillariophyceae, 4. Teil: Aclmantaceae. Gustav Fisher: Stuttgart; 437 pp.
29. Lange TR, Rada RG. 1993. Community dynamics in a typical navigation pool in the upper Mississippi River. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science 100: 21-27.
30. Maberly SC, Reynolds CS, George DG, Haworth EY, Lund JWG. 1994. The sensivity of freshwater planktonic communities to environmental change: monitoring, mechanisms and models. In Long Term Experiments in Agricultural and Ecological Sciences, Leigh R, Johnston AE (eds). CAB International: Wallingford, UK; 387-405.
31. Millerioux G, Grégoire A, Champeau A. 1981. Les populations de diatomées d'une rivière à débit régulé: le Verdon. Annals de Limnologie 17(1): 63-77.
32. Noppe K, Prygiel J, Coste M, Lepêtre A. 1999. Phytoplankton of the canalized Scarpe River downstream from the Douai sewage treatment plant. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 14(2): 167-178.
33. Reynolds CS. 1988. Potamoplankton: paradigms, paradoxes, prognoses. In Algae and the Aquatic Environment, Round FE (ed.). Biopress Ltd: Bristol; 285-311.
34. Reynolds CS. 1995. River plankton: the paradigm regained. In The Ecological Basis for River Management, Harper DM, Ferguson AJD (eds). Wiley: New York; 161-174.
35. Schmidt A. 1994. Main characteristics of the phytoplankton of the southern Hungarian section of the River Danube. Hydrobiologia 289: 97-108.
36. Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech J 27: 37-423.
37. Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Doledec S, Olivier JM. 1997. A.D.E. 4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Statistics and Computing 7: 75-83.
38. Valentin S, Wasson JG, Philippe M. 1995. Effects of hydropower peaking on epilithon and invertebrate community trophic structure. Regulated Rivers 10: 105-119.
39. Webster IT, Jones GJ, Oliver RL, Bormans RL, Sherman BS. 1996. Control Strategies for Cyanobacterial Blooms in Weir Pools, CEM Tech. Rep. 119. CSIRO: Australia.
40. Wehr JD, Descy JP. 1998. Use of phytoplankton in large river management. Journal of Phycology 34: 741-749.
41. Zimmermann HJ, Ward JV. 1984. A survey of regulated streams in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, U.S.A. In Regulated Rivers, Lillehammer A, Salveit SJ (eds). Oslo University Press: Oslo; 251-262.