Finding truths in clinical medicine: Through the looking glass - Cracked

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 566-569

  Schriger, David L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL MEDICINE; DATA ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0034758142     PISSN: 01960644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.119251     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Four models of the physician-patient relationship
2. Error in medicine
3. Clinical decision making: From theory to practice. The challenge
4. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals
5. Users' guides to the medical literature VI. How to use an overview
6. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature
7. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis
8. Invited commentary: A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods
9. Quality scores are useless and potentially misleading
10. Causation of bias: The episcope
11. Agreement among reviewers of review articles
12. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles
13. Practice policies: Where do they come from?
14. One is the loneliest number: Be skeptical of evidence summaries based on limited literature reviews
15. Scientific uncertainty and the role of expert advice: The case of health checks for coronary heart disease prevention by general practitioners in the UK