|
Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 69-78
|
Comparative steady-state bioavailability of sustained-release theophylline preparations: Theo-Dur®, Uni-Dur® and Xanthium®
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
FRANOL;
THEOPHYLLINE;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
ADULT;
AREA UNDER THE CURVE;
ARTICLE;
BIOEQUIVALENCE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CROSSOVER PROCEDURE;
DOSE RESPONSE;
DOSE TIME EFFECT RELATION;
DRUG ABSORPTION;
DRUG BIOAVAILABILITY;
DRUG BLOOD LEVEL;
DRUG CLEARANCE;
DRUG DOSAGE FORM;
FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION IMMUNOASSAY;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
MALE;
NORMAL HUMAN;
STEADY STATE;
SUSTAINED RELEASE PREPARATION;
XANTHIUM;
ADMINISTRATION, ORAL;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
ASTHMA;
BIOLOGICAL AVAILABILITY;
BRONCHODILATOR AGENTS;
CROSS-OVER STUDIES;
DELAYED-ACTION PREPARATIONS;
DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG;
HUMANS;
LUNG;
MALE;
THAILAND;
THEOPHYLLINE;
|
EID: 0034754116
PISSN: 0125877X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (11)
|
References (22)
|