Linear versus non-linear recordings of transiently-evoked otoacoustic emissions - Methodological considerations

Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement

Volumn 30, Issue 52, 2001, Pages 116-118

  Von Specht, Hellmutt ^a   Ganz, Micheal ^a   Pethe, Joachim ^a   Leuschner, Steffen ^a   Pytel, Joseph ^b  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Derived non linear recording; I O characteristics; Linear recording; Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLICK; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCREENING TEST; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TRANSIENT EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; ARTICLE; HEARING DISORDER; PHYSIOLOGY; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;

FEMALE; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; MALE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 0034744885     PISSN: 01078593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Bray PJ, Kemp DT. An advanced cochlear echo suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 191-204.
2. Kruglov AV, Artamasov SV, Frolenkov GI, Tavartkiladze GA. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission with unexpectedly short latency. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 117: 174-8.
3. Neumann J, Uppenkamp S, Kollmeier B. Detection of the acoustic reflex below 80 dB HL. Audiol Neurootol 1996; 1: 359-69.
4. Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Grandori F. Derived nonlinear versus linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Audiology 1996; 35: 73-86.
5. Tognola G, Ravazzani P, Grandori F. Some methodological considerations in the analysis of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Audiol Med 1998; 7: 155-72.