Prediction of developmental problems and disabilities during infancy: Cumulative non-optimality as a tool in surveillance of child development;Prediksjon av utviklingsvansker og funksjonshemning hos spedbarn

Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening

Volumn 120, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 317-321

  Rostad, Anne Margrethe ^a,b   Martinsen, Harald ^c   Eilertsen, Dag Erik ^d   Øvrelid, Marit ^e   Aas, Sigrid ^f   Kjelsvik, Øyvind ^g  

^a Habiliteringstjenesten for Barn   (Norway)

^b Samfunnsmedisinsk Forskningssenter   (Norway)

^c Institutt for spesialpedagogikk   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^e Trøndelag Kompetansesenter   (Norway)

^f Innherred Sykehus   (Norway)

^g Ringerike Medisinske Senter   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HANDICAPPED CHILD; HUMAN; INFANT; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; MULTIPLE MALFORMATION SYNDROME; NEWBORN; NORWAY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREGNANCY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ABNORMALITIES, MULTIPLE; CHILD BEHAVIOR DISORDERS; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; DISABLED CHILDREN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MENTAL RETARDATION; NORWAY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 0034731710     PISSN: 00292001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ramey CT, Ramey SL. Early intervention and early experience. Am Psychol 1998; 53: 109-20.
2. Piper E, Howlin P. Assessing and diagnosing developmental disorders that are not evident at birth: parental evaluations of intake prosedures. Child Care Health Dev 1992; 18: 35-55.
3. Wolley H, Stein A, Forrest GC, Baum JD. Imparting the diagnoses of life threatening illness in children. BMJ 1989; 289: 1623-6.
4. Molfese V, Thomson B. Optimality versus complications: assessing predictive values of perinatal scales. Child Dev 1985; 56: 810-23.
5. Meisels SJ. Can developmental screening tests identify children who are developmentally at risk? Pediatrics 1989; 83: 578-82.
6. Meisels S, Wasik B. Who should be served? Identifying children in need of early intervention. I: Meisels SJ, Shonkoff JP, red. Handbook of early childhood intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
7. Veileder for helsestasjons-og skolehelsetjenesten. 2-98 IK. 2617. Oslo: Statens helsetilsyn, 1998.
8. Bradley RH, Caldwell BM. The relationship of infants' home environment to achievement test performance in first grade: a follow up. Child Dev 1984; 55: 803-9.
9. Field T. Interaction patterns of preterm and term infants. I: Field TM, Sostec AM, Goldberg S, Shuman HH, red. Infants born at risk: behavior and development. New York: Medical and Scientific Books, 1979: 333-56.
10. Hall DMB. Health for all children. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
11. Thien MM. Developmental screening - a review. J Singapore Paediatric Society 1992; 34: 148-55.
12. Gilbride KE. Developmental testing. Pediatr Rev 1995; 16: 338-45.
13. Köhler L. Child health promotion: a task for social pediatrics. Sozial und Präventivmed 1993; 38: 34-8.
14. Sameroff AJ, Chandler MJ. Reproductive risk and the continuum of caretacing causality. I: Horowitz FD, Herterington M, Scarr-Salapatek S, Siegel G, red. Review of child development research. Bd. 4. Chicago: University Press, 1975: 187-244.
15. Rutter M. Continuities and discontinuities from infancy. I: Osofsky JD, red. Handbook of infant development. New York: Witey, 1987: 1256-96.
16. Horowitz FD. Developmental theory, prediction, and the developmental equations in follow-up research. I: Friedman SL, Haywood HC, red. Developmental follow-up. New York: Academic Press, 1994.
17. Sanson A, Prior M, Smart D. Reading disables with and without behaviour problems at 7-8 years: prediction from longitudinal data from infancy to 6 years. J Child Psychol Psychiat 1996; 37: 529-41.
18. Campbell SB. Behavior problems in preschool children: a review of recent researc. J Child Psychiat 1995; 36: 113-49.
19. Köhler L. Health for all children: a socio-pediatric issue. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1994; 394: 3-6.
20. Drillien CM, Pickering RM, Drummond MB. Predictive value of screening for different areas of development. Dev Med Child Neur 1988; 30: 294-305.
21. Prechtl H. The optimality concept. Early Hum Dev 1980; 4: 201-5.
22. Siegel LS, Saigal S, Rosenbaum P, Morton RA, Young A, Berenbaum S et al. Predictors of development in preterm and full-term infants: A model for detecting the at risk child. J Ped Psyc 1982; 7: 135-48.
23. Francis PL, Self PA, Horowitz FD. The behavioral assessment of the neonate: an overview. I: Osofsky JD, red. Handbook of infant development. 2. utg. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987: 723-79.
24. Hansen D, Dehlholm B. Psykososiale konsekvenser ved screeningundersøgelser af børn. Nord Med 1992; 17: 280-2.
25. Rostad AM, Øvrelid M, Aas S, Jermstad E. Rapport fra prosjekt «Tidlig intervensjon». Arbeidsrapport 1. Verdal: Folkehelsa, 1996.
26. Frankenburg WK, Fandal AW, Thornton SM. Revision of the Denver Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire. J Pediatr 1986; 110: 653-7.
27. Fagan JF, Singer LT, Montie JE, Shepherd PA. Selective screening device for the early detection of normal or delayed cognitive development in infants at risk for later mental retardation. Pediatrics 1986; 78: 1021-6.
28. Aas S, Rostad AM, Vannebo UT. Evalueringen av tidlig intervensjonsmetoden. Rapport til Sosial-og helsedepartementet. Innherred: Innherred sykehus, 1999.
29. Grøholt EK, Borge AI, Nordhagen R. Har vi fått en ny barnesykelighet? Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1994; 114: 3487-9.
30. Dunn J. Normative life events as risk factors in childhood. I: Rutter M, red. Studies of psychosocial risk: the power of longitudinal data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988: 227-44.