메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 321, Issue 7256, 2000, Pages 255-256

Which clinical studies provide the best evidence?: The best RCT still trumps the best observational study

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDITORIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

EID: 0034730003     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7256.255     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (301)

References (11)
  • 2
    • 0017745716 scopus 로고
    • Evidence favouring the use of anticoagulants in the hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction
    • Chalmers TC, Matta RJ, Smith Jr H, Kunzler A-M. Evidence favouring the use of anticoagulants in the hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1977; 297: 1091–1096
    • (1977) N Engl J Med , vol.297 , pp. 1091-1096
    • Chalmers, T.C.1    Matta, R.J.2    Smith, H.3    Kunzler, A.-M.4
  • 3
    • 0020045659 scopus 로고
    • Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials
    • Sacks H, Chalmers TC, Smith Jr H. Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials. Am J Med 1982; 72: 233–240
    • (1982) Am J Med , vol.72 , pp. 233-240
    • Sacks, H.1    Chalmers, T.C.2    Smith, H.3
  • 4
    • 0034702233 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparison of observational and randomized controlled trials
    • Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational and randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1878–1886
    • (2000) N Engl J Med , vol.342 , pp. 1878-1886
    • Benson, K.1    Hartz, A.J.2
  • 5
    • 0034702175 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies and the hierarchy of research designs
    • Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1887–1892
    • (2000) N Engl J Med , vol.342 , pp. 1887-1892
    • Concato, J.1    Shah, N.2    Horwitz, R.I.3
  • 6
    • 0034702184 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomized trials or observational tribulations?
    • Pocock SJ, Elbourne DR. Randomized trials or observational tribulations? N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1907–1909
    • (2000) N Engl J Med , vol.342 , pp. 1907-1909
    • Pocock, S.J.1    Elbourne, D.R.2
  • 7
    • 0034620242 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?
    • Gotzsche PC, Olsen O. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 2000; 355: 129–134
    • (2000) Lancet , vol.355 , pp. 129-134
    • Gotzsche, P.C.1    Olsen, O.2
  • 8
    • 0032547326 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women
    • Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, Furberg C, Herrington D, Riggs B, et al. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. JAMA 1998; 280: 605–613
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 605-613
    • Hulley, S.1    Grady, D.2    Bush, T.3    Furberg, C.4    Herrington, D.5    Riggs, B.6
  • 10
    • 0032585188 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials
    • Kunz R, Oxman AD. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. BMJ 1998; 317: 1185–1190
    • (1998) BMJ , vol.317 , pp. 1185-1190
    • Kunz, R.1    Oxman, A.D.2
  • 11
    • 0003489246 scopus 로고
    • Evanston, IL Northwestern University Press
    • Twining W. Rethinking evidence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1994.
    • (1994) Rethinking evidence
    • Twining, W.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.