Resuscitation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation with use of monophasic and biphasic waveform pulses for external defibrillation

Circulation

Volumn 101, Issue 25, 2000, Pages 2968-2974

  Leng, Charles T ^a,d   Paradis, Norman A ^b   Calkins, Hugh ^a   Berger, Ronald D ^a   Lardo, Albert C ^c   Rent, Kenneth C ^c   Halperin, Henry R ^a,c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b Department of Emergency Medicine   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Defibrillation waveform; Resuscitation; Ventricular fibrillation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CARDIOVERSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFIBRILLATION; DOG; HEART VENTRICLE FIBRILLATION; HEMODYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION; SINUS RHYTHM; STUNNED HEART MUSCLE;

EID: 0034720824     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.25.2968     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bardy GH, Ivey TD, Allen MD, et al. A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:728-733.
2. Jones JL, Swartz JF, Jones RE, et al. Increasing fibrillation duration enhances relative asymmetrical biphasic versus monophasic defibrillator waveform efficacy. Circ Res. 1990;67:376-384.
3. Block MB, Hammel D, Bocker D, et al. A prospective randomized crossover comparison of mono- and biphasic defibrillation using nonthoracotomy lead configurations in humans. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1994;5:581-590.
4. Kerber RE, Sarnat W. Factors influencing the success of ventricular defibrillation in man. Circulation. 1979;60:226-230.
5. Windecker S, Ideker RE, Plumb VJ, et al. The influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:33-38.
6. Halperin HR, Tsitlik JE, Gelfand M, et al. A preliminary study of CPR by circumferential compression of the chest with use of a pneumatic vest. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:762-768.
7. Bardy GH, Marchlinski FE, Sharma AD, et al. Multicenter comparison of truncated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine-wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. Circulation. 1996;94: 2507-2514.
8. Walcott GP, Melnick SB, Chapman FW, et al. Relative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation after short and long durations of ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 1998;98: 2210-2215.
9. Bardy GH, Ivey TD, Allen M, et al. A prospective, randomized evaluation of effect of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation thresholds in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:1362-1366.
10. Doherty PW, McLaughlin PR, Billingham M, et al. Cardiac damage produced by direct current countershock applied to the heart. Am J Cardiol. 1979;43:225-232.
11. Tovar O, Tung L. Electroporation of cardiac cell membranes with monophasic or biphasic rectangular pulses. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991;14:1987-1991.
12. Reddy RK, Gleva MJ, Gliner BE, et al. Biphasic transthoracic defibrillation causes fewer ECG ST-segment changes after shock. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;30:127-134.
13. Ehsani A, Ewy GA, Sobel BE. Effects of electrical countershock on serum creatine-phosphokinase isoenzyme activity. Am J Cardiol. 1976; 37:12-18.
14. Cole BN, Nicolosi AC, Uygur IJ, et al. Effects of simulated intraoperative electrophysiological testing on function of the canine left ventricle. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;46:556-562.
15. Stoddard MF, Redd RR, Buckingham TA, et al. Effects of electrophysiologic testing of the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator on LV systolic function and diastolic filling. Am Heart J. 1991;122: 714-719.
16. Kerber RE, Martins JB, Gascho JA, et al. Effect of direct-current countershocks on regional myocardial contractility and perfusion. Circulation. 1981;63:323-332.
17. Ditchey RV, LeWinter MM. Effects of direct-current electrical shocks on systolic and diastolic left ventricular function in dogs. Am Heart J. 1983;105:727-731.
18. Runsio M, Bergfeldt L, Brodin A, et al. Left ventricular function after repeated episodes of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation assessed by transesophageal echocardiography. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:124-131.
19. Osswald S, Trouton TG, O'Nunain SS, et al. Relation between shockrelated myocardial injury and defibrillation efficacy of monophasic and biphasic shocks in a canine model. Circulation. 1994;90:2501-2509.
20. Tokano T, Bach D, Chang J, et al. Effect of ventricular shock strength on cardiac hemodynamics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998;9:791-797.
21. Pansegrau DG, Abboud FM. Hemodynamic changes due to intraoperative testing of the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: implications for anesthesia management. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993; 7:442-447.
22. Jones JL, Jones RE. Decreased defibrillator-induced dysfunction with biphasic rectangular waveforms. Am J Physiol. 1984;247:H792-H796.
23. Jones JL, Lepeschkin E, Jones RE, et al. Response of cultured myocardial cells to countershock-type electric field stimulation. Am J Physiol. 1978; 235:H214-H222.
24. Koretsune Y, Marban E. Cell calcium in the pathophysiology of ventricular fibrillation and in the pathogenesis of postarrhythmic contractile dysfunction. Circulation. 1989;80:360-379.
25. Caterine MR, Spencer KT, Pagan-Carlo LA, et al. Direct-current shocks to the heart generate free radicals: an electron paramagnetic resonance study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1598-1609.
26. Paradis NA, Martin GB, Rivers EP, et al. Coronary perfusion pressure and the return of spontaneous circulation in human CPR. JAMA. 1990; 263:1106-1113.
27. Niemann JT, Cairns CB, Sharma J, et al. Treatment of prolonged ventricular fibrillation: immediate countershock versus high-dose epinephrine and CPR preceding countershock. Circulation. 1992;85:281-287.