Stimuli outside the classical receptive field modulate the synchronization of action potentials between cells in visual cortex of cats

NeuroReport

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 1313-1317

  Bretzner, F ^a   Aitoubah J ^a   Shumikhina, S ^a   Tan, Y F ^a   Molotchnikoff, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Binding hypotheses; Contextual effects; Synchronization

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CAT; CELL SYNCHRONIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACILITATION; IMAGE DISPLAY; NONHUMAN; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0034720266     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200004270-00033     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 1. Phillips WA and Singer W. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20, 657-722 (1997).
2. 2. Singer W and Gray CM. Annu Rev Neurosci 18, 555-586 (1995).
3. 3. Gray CM. Neuron 24, 31-47 (1999).
4. 4. Lamme VAF and Spekreijse H. Nature 396, 362-366 (1999).
5. 5. Sillito AM, Grieve KL and Jenes HE et al. Nature 378, 492-499 (1995).
6. 6. Li C-Y, Lei JJ and Yao HS et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 4052-4056 (1999).
7. 7. DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD and Ohzawa I. J Neurophysiol 71, 347-374 (1994).
8. 8. Engel AK, König P and Singer W. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88, 9136-9140 (1991).
9. 9. Engel AK, König P, Gray CM et al. Eur J Neurosci 2, 588-606 (1990).
10. 10. Gray CM, König P, Engel AK et al. Nature 338, 334-337 (1989).
11. 11. Freiwald WA, Wreiter AK, Singer W et al. Neuroreport 6, 2348-2352 (1995).
12. 12. Kreiter AK and Singer W. J Neurosci 16, 2381-2396 (1996).
13. 13. Aersten AMHJ and Gerstein GL. Brain Res 340, 341-354 (1995).
14. 14. Melssen WJ and Epping WJ. Biol Cybernet 57, 403-414 (1987).
15. 15. Eggermont J. J Neurophysiol 68, 1216-1228 (1992).
16. 16. Johnson MJ and Alloway KD. J Neurophysiol 75, 1444-1457 (1996).