-
1
-
-
0034719739
-
-
Zhou, B.; Edmondson, S.; Padron, J.; Danishefsky, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2039.
-
(2000)
Tetrahedron Lett.
, vol.41
, pp. 2039
-
-
Zhou, B.1
Edmondson, S.2
Padron, J.3
Danishefsky, S.J.4
-
2
-
-
0017652901
-
-
(a)
-
(a) Arai, T.; Takahashi, K.; Kubo, A. J. Antibiot. 1977, 30, 1015.
-
(1977)
J. Antibiot.
, vol.30
, pp. 1015
-
-
Arai, T.1
Takahashi, K.2
Kubo, A.3
-
3
-
-
0019288885
-
-
(b)
-
(b) Arai, T.; Takahashi, K.; Ishiguro, K.; Mikami, T. Gann. 1980, 71, 790.
-
(1980)
Gann.
, vol.71
, pp. 790
-
-
Arai, T.1
Takahashi, K.2
Ishiguro, K.3
Mikami, T.4
-
4
-
-
0026474576
-
-
Sakai, R.; Rinehart, K. L.; Guan, Y.; Wang, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 11456.
-
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
, vol.89
, pp. 11456
-
-
Sakai, R.1
Rinehart, K.L.2
Guan, Y.3
Wang, A.4
-
5
-
-
0029805757
-
-
Corey, E. J.; Gin, D. Y.; Kania, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9202.
-
(1996)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.118
, pp. 9202
-
-
Corey, E.J.1
Gin, D.Y.2
Kania, R.S.3
-
6
-
-
0029838307
-
-
For recent reviews, see: (a) Pommier, Y.; Kohlhagen, G.; Bailly, C.; Waring, M.; Mazumder, A.; Kohn, K. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 13303.
-
(1996)
Biochemistry
, vol.35
, pp. 13303
-
-
Pommier, Y.1
Kohlhagen, G.2
Bailly, C.3
Waring, M.4
Mazumder, A.5
Kohn, K.6
-
7
-
-
0033616691
-
-
For recent reviews, see: (a) Pommier, Y.; Kohlhagen, G.; Bailly, C.; Waring, M.; Mazumder, A.; Kohn, K. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 13303. (b) Martinez, E. J.; Owa, T.; Schreiber, S. L.; Corey, E. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 3496.
-
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
, vol.96
, pp. 3496
-
-
Martinez, E.J.1
Owa, T.2
Schreiber, S.L.3
Corey, E.J.4
-
8
-
-
0022000514
-
-
Danishefsky, S. J.; Harrison, P. J.; Webb, R. R.; O'Neill, B. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 1421.
-
(1985)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.107
, pp. 1421
-
-
Danishefsky, S.J.1
Harrison, P.J.2
Webb, R.R.3
O'Neill, B.T.4
-
10
-
-
0343985942
-
-
Attempts to reach 6 by means of a 3-point attachment of a formic acid equivalent were unsuccessful. Only with the aromatic aldehyde in place was cyclization realized
-
Attempts to reach 6 by means of a 3-point attachment of a formic acid equivalent were unsuccessful. Only with the aromatic aldehyde in place was cyclization realized.
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
0342679659
-
-
The stereochemistry assigned to 6 and 11 was verified by a crystallographic determination at a later stage of the synthetic sequence.
-
The stereochemistry assigned to 6 and 11 was verified by a crystallographic determination at a later stage of the synthetic sequence.
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
0343549942
-
-
Subsequent studies reveal that the stereochemical outcome of the Mannich closure step is also a function of the substitution pattern on the aldehyde-containing aromatic ring that enters into the cyclization event. These matters will be discussed in a fuller treatment of the subject.
-
Subsequent studies reveal that the stereochemical outcome of the Mannich closure step is also a function of the substitution pattern on the aldehyde-containing aromatic ring that enters into the cyclization event. These matters will be discussed in a fuller treatment of the subject.
-
-
-
|