Control of wind turbines using memory-based method

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 263-275

  Song, Y D ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA A AND T STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Operating condition; Pitch control; Power efficiency; Tracking stability; Variable speed; Wind turbine

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS; SPEED CONTROL; SYSTEM STABILITY; TURBOMACHINE BLADES;

PITCH CONTROL;

WIND TURBINES;

PITCH CONTROL; SPEED CONTROL SYSTEM; VARIABLE SPEED WIND TURBINE;

EID: 0034709198     PISSN: 01676105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00129-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. C.G. Atkeson, D.J. Reinkensmeyer, Using associate content-addressable memories to control robots, W.T. Miller, R.S. Sutton, P.J. Werbos (Eds.), Neural Networks for Control, Multiscience Press, Inc., 1992, pp. 255-285.
2. G. Cybenko, Approximation by superposition of a sigmoidal function, Math. Control Signals Systems (2) (1989) 303-314.
3. E. Fix, J.L. Hodges Jr., Discriminatory analysis, non-parameteric regression: consistency properties, Technical Report No. 4, USAF School Aviation Medicine Randolph Field, TX AF- 41-(128)-31, 1951.
4. Lorenz E.N. Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues. J. Atmos. Sci. 26:1969;636-646.
5. A.W. Moore, Efficient memory-based learning for robot control, Ph.D. Thesis, Technical Report 229, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, October 1990.
6. Schaal S., Atkeson C.G. Robot juggling: implementation of memory-based learning. IEEE Control Systems. 14(1):1994;57-71.
7. Stanfill C., Waltz D. Toward memory-based reasoning, commun. ACM. 29(12):1986;1213-1228.
8. Steinbuch K., Piske U.A. Learning matrices and their applications. IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 12:1963;846-862.
9. Waltz D.L. Applications of the connection machine. Computer. 20(1):1987;85-90.
10. Albus J.S. A new appraoch to manipulator control: the cerebellar model articulation controller (CMAC). ASME Trans. J. Dyn. Systems, Meas. Control. 97:1975;220-227.
11. Albus J.S. Data storage in the cerebellar model articulation controller (CMAC). ASME Trans. J. Dyn. Systems Meas. Control. 97:1975;228-233.
12. Steinbuch M., Bosqra O.H. Optimal output feedback of a wind energy conversion system, IFAC Power Systems Modeling and Control Applications. 1988;Brussels, Belgium.
13. Kreyszig E. Advanced Engineering Mathematics. 2nd Edition:1968;Wiley, New York.
14. Taylor C.W., Nassief F.R., Cresap R.L. Northwest power pool transient stability and load shedding controls for generation-load imbalances. IEEE Trans. PAS. PAS-100(7):1981;2486-2495.
15. G.L. Johnson, Wind Power Systems, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1985.
16. Salle S.A., Reardon D., Leithead W.E., Grimble M.J. Review of wind turbine control. Int. J. Control. 52(6):1990;1215-1310.
17. E. Muljadi, C.P. Butterfield, P. Migliore, Variable speed operation of generators with rotor-speed feedback in wind power applications, Proceedings of the 15th ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Houston, TX, 1996.
18. Thirnger T., Linders J. Control of variable speed of a fixed-pitch wind turbine operating in a wide speed range. IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion. 8(3):1993;520-526.
19. Hilloow R.M., Sharaf A.M. A rule-based fuzzy logic controller for a PMW inverter in a stand alone wind energy conversion scheme. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 32(1):1996;57-65.
20. Novak P., Ekelund T., Jovik I., Schidtbauer B. Modeling and control of variable-speed wine-turbine drive-system dynamics. IEEE Control System Mag. 15(4):1995;28-38.